• Cabinet
  • Bureaux
  • Carrières
  • Nouvelles
  • Étudiants
  • Anciens
  • Paiements
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • Équipe
  • Services
  • Ressources
  • Recherche
  • EN Menu
  • Recherche mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Voir tout
Domaines de pratique
Droit des sociétés Litiges Affaires réglementaires Droit fiscal Voir tout
Secteurs
Projets d’investissement Énergie Fonds et finances Mines Voir tout
Enjeux Strategiques
Gestion des crises et des risques Stratégie et solutions ESG Affaires gouvernementales et politiques publiques
Consultez les mandats représentatifs
Expérience internationale
Perspectives Nouvelles Événements S’abonner
Aperçu trimestriel sur les fusions et acquisitions Quarterly Fintech Insights Série sur la nouvelle économie de l’énergie L'ESG et le DSI
Angle d'arbitrage Balado « Business Law Talks » Perspectives économiques Actions collectives : Regarder vers l’avenir
Équipe
Domaines de pratique
Secteurs
Enjeux Strategiques
Mandats représentatifs
Cabinet
Bureaux
Nouvelles
Carrières
Perspectives
Étudiants
Événements
Recherche
Anciens
Paiements
S’abonner

Restez au fait des dernières nouvelles et de nos événements dans le domaine des affaires et celui du droit.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 
Blogue

Privilege is Sacrosanct: Ontario Court of Appeal Affirms High Threshold for Abrogation of Privilege

18 mai 2023

Écrit par Scott Bower, Preet Gill, Russell Kruger and Kristina Dimitrov

Legislation must show a clear, explicit and unequivocal intention to abrogate privilege before a party is required to disclose privileged information, the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated in its recent decision of Ontario (Auditor General) v. Laurentian University, 2023 ONCA 299 [Laurentian University]. Inferences and open-textured language are not enough.

Privilege, which protects some information from having to be disclosed, is a hallmark of the Canadian legal system. Legal advice and litigation privilege are necessary to build and maintain a relationship of trust and confidence between a lawyer and client and to allow for a zone of privacy for preparing for litigation. Canadian courts have repeatedly emphasized the fundamental importance of safeguarding privilege in Canadian law.

In Laurentian University, the Court considered whether the Auditor General of Ontario had the authority to request and review disclosure of privileged information and records from a government grant recipient, the Laurentian University of Sudbury. The Auditor General initiated a value-for-money audit of Laurentian's operations. The Auditor General requested privileged documents as part of the audit based on the Auditor General Act (the Act), which says the Auditor General is "entitled to have free access to all books … reports, files and all other papers". Laurentian declined the request on the basis that it was not required to disclose privileged documents.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Superior Court of Justice denying the disclosure request. Noting that "solicitor-client privilege is not merely a rule of evidence, but an important civil and legal right as well as a principle of fundamental justice in Canadian law" and that "[l]itigation privilege is also fundamental to the proper functioning of our legal system", the Court emphasized the importance of safeguarding privilege absent a clear legislative intent to the contrary.

Turning to the language of the Act at issue, the Court noted that "privilege cannot be abrogated by inference", and "[o]pen-textured language governing production of documents will be read not to include solicitor-client documents". Therefore, the fact the Act allowed the disclosure of privileged information to the Auditor General without it resulting in a waiver was not sufficient to abrogate privilege. Instead, abrogation of privilege requires language that is "clear, explicit, and unequivocal", as is seen in other legislation such as the Law Society Act and the Health Insurance Act. The application judge's reliance on this other legislation, enacted over the same timeframe, where privilege was abrogated in express language, was endorsed, as was his reference to Hansard debates and extrinsic aids.

Laurentian University thus upholds and affirms the importance of privilege under Canadian law. Privilege is sacrosanct, a "civil right of supreme importance" that must "remain as close to absolute as possible" to be effective. 

If you have any questions about this case, please reach out to the authors of this blog.

Télécharger le PDF

Auteur(e)s

  • Scott H. D. Bower Scott H. D. Bower, Associé
  • Preet K.  Gill Preet K. Gill, Associée
  • Russell J. Kruger Russell J. Kruger, Avocat

Arbitration Angle: Curated Insights from 2023

Liens connexes

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Articles récents

Blogue

More Legislative Changes on the Horizon for Ontario Employers

05 décembre 2023
       

Blogue

Canada's Clean Tech Push & Alberta's Carbon Incentive

04 décembre 2023
       

Blogue

Update on Alberta's Renewables Pause: Expert Recommendations [...]

29 novembre 2023
       

Blogue

Changes to Ontario's Employment-Related Legislation Have Arrived

28 novembre 2023
       

Blogue

How Canadian Investment Can Help Rebuild Ukraine

27 novembre 2023
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Cabinet
  • Leadership
  • Diversité
  • Communauté
  • Innovation
  • Sécurité
  • Historique
Bureaux
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Se connecter
  • Perspectives
  • Nouvelles
  • Événements
  • Carrières
  • Étudiants
  • Anciens
S’abonner

Restez au fait des dernières nouvelles et de nos événements dans le domaine des affaires et celui du droit.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2023. Tous droits réservés. Traduction alimentée par l’IA.
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Avis de non-responsabilité
  • Conditions d’utilisation
Logo Bennett Jones