• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

Additional Insights on APO Practice and Procedure in Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings in Canada, Mexico and the United States

2015

Canada's Special Import Measures Act (SIMA) and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act each contain provisions that create an offence for failure to comply with a confidentiality undertaking entered into under those statutes. Both offences include the maximum penalty of a fine of up to CAD 1 million if the person is tried on indictment (or a fine of up to CAD 100,000 upon summary conviction). Offences of this nature are initiated on the consent of the Attorney General of Canada and prosecuted by the Public Prosecution Service of Canada. Additionally, counsel who has breached a disclosure
undertaking may be ineligible to enter into future undertakings with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) or the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT), which would severely limit that person's ability to represent clients in future cases before these bodies. In the normal course, one might expect the first procedure to emanate from a complaint or motion by the wronged party to the CITT or the CBSA, as the case may be. Written by Darrel H. Pearson and Jessica B. Horwitz, and published Volume 10 of Global Trade and Customs Journal, Issue 4, pp. 161–170.

Key Contact

  • Jessica B. Horwitz Jessica B. Horwitz, Partner

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • International Trade & Investment

Recent Posts

In The News

Follow-Ons and Convertibles in Canada’s Equity Capital Markets

May 29, 2025
       

Client Work

Silver Viper Minerals to Acquire Cimarron Gold-Copper Project from CSAC Holdings Inc.

May 27, 2025
       

Updates

Class Actions: Looking Forward 2025

May 22, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Lincoln Caylor Speaks on Report Writing in OBA Investigation Series

May 20, 2025
       

In The News

How To Stay Resilient in an Uncertain World

May 16, 2025
       

Announcements

Bennett Jones Wins Big at Benchmark Litigation Awards

May 09, 2025
       

In The News

Managing Risk Amid Tariff Chaos

May 09, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Insights on Tariff Strategy and Cross-Border Trade Compliance

May 08, 2025
       

In The News

John Manley on NPR’s Morning Edition on Mark Carney’s White House Visit

May 06, 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones