People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Vincent M. de Grandpré

Intellectual Property Litigation and Strategy Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner

In two companion appeals relating to patents over television interactive programming guides, the Federal Court of Appeal clarified that a successful patent plaintiff is entitled to an accounting of the defendant’s profits linked to the infringement, unless the defendant shows why the court should not award this remedy. The Court of Appeal also reiterated that a permanent injunction is the expected remedy flowing from the infringement of a Canadian patent, even where the patented invention forms only a small part of the relevant commercial product, and even when the patentee is in the business of licensing, rather than practicing, its invention in Canada.

Canadian Patentees are Presumptively Entitled to  the Remedies of an Accounting of Profits

Canadian Patentees are Presumptively Entitled to  the Remedies of an Accounting of Profits and a Permanent Injunction

Lorelei Graham

Food and Agribusiness Lawyer, IP Lawyer, Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

On May 24, 2024, after nearly 25 years of negotiations, the World Intellectual Property Office announced that member states, including Canada, had agreed to a new <a rel="noopener noreferrer" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2024/article_0007.html" target="_blank">Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge</a>. This Treaty is a long-awaited first step in addressing the relationship between intellectual property over genetic resources and related Indigenous traditional knowledge.

A New International Treaty on Intellectual Property and Indigenous Knowledge

A New International Treaty on Intellectual Property and Indigenous Knowledge and its Potential Impact on Canadian Agricultural Innovation

Shelby Morrison

Commercial Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Associate

Ana Nizharadze

In intellectual property cases, parties often agree to split their proceeding between liability and subsequent quantification phases if they believe that a "bifurcation" would simplify the litigation. Bifurcation is justified when it is likely to reduce the complexity of the action and streamline an eventual damages assessment. The courts have held that bifurcation is not justified, however, when its sole rationale is the alleged lack of merit of claims or defences.

Did You Plead That Federal Court Clarifies Bifurcation Motion Complexity in Amazon Case

Did you plead that? On a Bifurcation Motion, Federal Court in Amazon.com Clarifies that Alleged Complexity must Translate from the Pleadings

In Promotion In Motion Inc. v Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC, <a rel="noopener noreferrer" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/525397/index.do" target="_blank">2024 FC 556</a>, the applicant PIM Brands appealed the Trademarks Opposition Board's refusal to register trademark applications for SWISSKISS and SWISSKISS & Design covering "Chocolate of Swiss origin". Hershey Chocolate & Confectionary LLC had successfully opposed registration of PIM's applications based on its own prior registrations for KISSES and KISS, covering "solid chocolate candy with or without ingredients such as nuts" and "chocolate candy".

Kissing Registration Goodbye Deficient Online Survey Evidence Cannot Save Application for SWISSKISS

Kissing Registration Goodbye: Deficient Online Survey Evidence Cannot Save Application for SWISSKISS Trademarks

Sarah E. Gilbert

Regulatory, Environmental and Health and Safety Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Julia E. Schatz

Commercial Litigation, Agribusiness, Arbitration, Real Estate, Construction and Environmental Litigation at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner 

Gatlin Smeijers

Environmental Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

On December 31, 2025, the Federal Government published the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2025 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. When they come into effect on June 30, 2026, the 2025 Regulations will repeal and replace the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2012. The Federal Government published a proposed version of the 2025 Regulations in 2022 for public consultation.

Federal Government Publishes Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations

Federal Government Publishes Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2025

William S. Osler KC

Capital Markets, Securities, M&A and Corporate Governance Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Drew C. Broughton

Corporate Commercial and M&A Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Audrix Arce

Articling Student

Recent changes to the Commissioner of Lobbying&rsquo;s interpretation of the federal Lobbying Act significantly lower the threshold for mandatory lobbyist registration. As of January 2026, organizations may be required to register if employees collectively spend as little as eight hours lobbying within a four-week period, including preparation and written communications. This update has important compliance implications for corporations and other organizations engaging with federal public office holders.

Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements

Natalia E. Iamundo

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Alixe A.L. Cameron

Corporate Commercial and Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Troy Mack

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Rights of first refusal and rights of first offer are often used interchangeably, but they carry very different legal consequences in Alberta land transactions. This post explains how Alberta legislation and case law treat each right, why only a ROFR can support a caveat, and what parties should consider when structuring agreements to protect their interests.

Right of First Refusal vs Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions

Right of First Refusal vs. Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions 

Edward (Ted) Yoo

Intellectual Property Lawyer and Canada/US Patent and Trademark Agent at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Partner, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Ahmed Elmallah

Intellectual Property Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Counsel, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Joshua Kim

Articling Student at Bennett Jones in Edmonton

The Alberta Court of King&rsquo;s Bench decision in SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther confirms that intellectual property includes confidential processes, trade secrets and institutional know-how. The Court&rsquo;s injunction highlights the power of confidentiality agreements and the irreparable harm that can result from misuse of confidential information.

Protecting Your Proprietary Information Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

Protecting Your Proprietary Information: Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

Shahrose Javed

Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Andrew L. Jeanrie

Commercial Real Estate and Infrastructure Development Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Inclusionary zoning is a planning tool that requires certain new residential developments to include a prescribed percentage of affordable housing units.&nbsp;IZ was introduced as a unique zoning tool for Ontario&mdash;it would use zoning bylaws not only to dictate the uses permitted in a given area, but also as a tool to control the market price of what that zoning permits. 
<div>&nbsp;</div>

Ontario Moves to Pause Inclusionary Zoning Obligations

Inclusionary Zoning in Ontario: Ontario Moves to Pause Inclusionary Zoning Obligations 

Title Alphabetical

Title

BennettJones

de Grandpre Vincent

Aboriginal Law

Intellectual Property Law