The Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) delivery model is common for large-scale and complex public and private infrastructure projects. However, given the size of these projects, the terms and conditions, and compensation models of typical EPC contracts, the model includes many risk allocation disputes. These risks can invite an adversarial approach to the contractual relationship, increasing transaction costs, and lengthy and costly dispute resolution. If this is known, these costs may be built into the pricing at the risk of an EPC not being successful in winning the work. Jason Roth and Geoff Stenger participate in this panel discussion, "EPC Contract: Love it or Leave it," for the Society of Construction Lawyers.
Speaking Engagement
EPC Contract: Love it or Leave it
February 24, 2021
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllBlog
BC Government Announces it is Soliciting Feedback on Prompt Payment Legislation
June 3, 2026 & 1 more
Blog
Alberta and Canada Sign Co-operation Agreement to Reduce Assessment Duplication
April 22, 2026 & 1 more
Latest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference for Spoliation
August 5, 2026Ethan Z. Schiff
Blog
Ontario Court Reinforces Finality of Class Proceedings in Rejecting Late Opt-Out Request
July 17, 2026Ethan Z. Schiff & Evana Yukanna
Blog
No Standing Without Specifics: Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms that Cumulative Effects are no Substitute for Evidence
July 16, 2026Martin Ignasiak KC, Tyler McDonough & Logan Lazurko























