People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Manage Cookies

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Elad Travis

Corporate and Competition Lawyer

Counsel

Ted M. Shoub

Corporate & Commercial Lawyer | M&A, Governance & Ventures

Partner

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are transforming how businesses in a wide range of industries operate. Initially considered something exclusively for military purposes, the drone industry has branched out, developing a multitude of commercial applications, including in oil & gas, mining, agriculture, retail, delivery services and health care.

The Unlimited Potential of Drones Investment and Collaboration Opportunities between Canada Israel

The Unlimited Potential of Drones: Investment and Collaboration Opportunities between Canada and Israel

Since COVID-19 hit, almost every aspect of our lives has been touched by the pandemic, including the way health care is provided. Remote health solutions (aka digital health solutions, virtual care, telemedicine or telehealth) like remote diagnosis, remote monitoring, medical adherence and others have stepped in to address an urgent need. Innovative companies in Israel and Canada have been hard at work developing these kinds of solutions, creating opportunities for revolutionizing health care—all the while helping their investors profit during these challenging economic times.

Remote Health Solutions in Canada and Israel Here to Stay

Remote Health Solutions in Canada and Israel—Here to Stay

Elad Travis authored&nbsp;"Comment: Ohio Et Al v. American Express Co. Et Al - Potential Effects on the Competition Bureau's and Competition Tribunal's Views of 'Multi-Sided Platforms'" (2019), 32:1 Can Comp L Rev 63.&nbsp;

Comment re Ohio v American Express

Comment: Ohio v. American Express - "Multi-Sided Platforms"

Katherine Booth

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

The BC Court of Appeal in Cleaver v. The Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited upheld the refusal to certify a privacy class action, finding no basis in fact for the claim&rsquo;s central allegation. The decision reinforces the courts&rsquo; gatekeeping role at certification and the importance of evidentiary support for the core allegations underlying a proposed class proceeding.

BC Court of Appeal No basis in fact no class action

BC Court of Appeal: No Basis in Fact = No Class Action 

Michael C. Smith

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

George W. H. Reid

International Trade, Investment and Public Procurement Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

The Government of Canada has published a new Notice concerning the rules and procedures governing the administration of the quota for imports of electric vehicles from the People's Republic of China for the second period of Quota Year 1 (September 1, 2026 to February 28, 2027). The Notice, issued by Global Affairs Canada under the Export and Import Permits Act, confirms that the second allocation period will continue to operate similar to the first allocation period.&nbsp;

Notice Concerning the Quota for Imports of Chinese Electric Vehicles

Second Allocation Period Opens September 1, 2026

Edwin G. Kroft KC

Tax Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones

Kate Kim

Associate

Andrew Young

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Issue 43 of Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes highlights recent developments in Canadian tax litigation and dispute resolution. This edition examines the limits of the Minister's ability to advance alternative assessment arguments, clarifies who may deduct legal costs incurred in tax disputes, and explores the role of price adjustment clauses in estate freeze transactions

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes Issue 43

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes: August 2026

Carl Cunningham

Management-side Employment Lawyer

David Cassin

Employment Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Julia Horowitz

Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

In Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd., 2026 ONCA 572, the Ontario Court of Appeal clarified that equity-based compensation, including RSUs, may constitute a term or condition of employment that must be preserved during the statutory notice period under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The decision highlights the need for employers to carefully review RSU forfeiture provisions and saving language to ensure compliance with employment standards legislation, while confirming that the threshold for punitive damages remains high.

RSU Forfeiture Revisited Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers

RSU Forfeiture Revisited: Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers

Alison G. FitzGerald

International Arbitration Lawyer

Sabrina A. Bandali

International Trade, Regulatory and Investment Lawyer

Canada has introduced a new round of retaliatory tariffs on $27.6 billion worth of US goods in response to the Trump administration's 50% tariffs on Canadian exports. The measures, effective September 8, 2026, include surtaxes ranging from 15% to 50% on a wide range of products, alongside remission programs and duty relief mechanisms for affected businesses.

Comment: Ohio v. American Express - "Multi-Sided Platforms"

From the Same Authors

The Unlimited Potential of Drones: Investment and Collaboration Opportunities between Canada and Israel

Remote Health Solutions in Canada and Israel—Here to Stay

Comment: Ohio v. American Express - "Multi-Sided Platforms"

Latest Insights

BC Court of Appeal: No Basis in Fact = No Class Action

Notice Concerning the Quota for Imports of Chinese Electric Vehicles

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes: August 2026

RSU Forfeiture Revisited: Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers

Stay on top of the latest.