People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Manage Cookies

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Preet K. Gill

Insolvency & Restructuring Lawyer | Litigation & Transactions

Toronto Managing Partner

Melissa Birman

Commercial, Corporate Governance & Securities Lawyer

Knowledge Management Lawyer

Talia K. Bregman

Management-side Employment Lawyer

Employment Services, National Practice Group Leader

Members of Bennett Jones were involved in the writing of various chapters of <em>Directors' Duties in Canada</em>, 6th ed., edited by Barry Reiter and published in Canada by CCH Canadian Limited, including Hugo Alves, Milos Barutciski, Melissa Birman, Stephen Burns, Carl Cunningham, Geoffrey Dyer, Len Griffiths, Bruce Hibbard, Mark Jewett, Martin Kratz, Jeff Leon, Brad Markel, Jesslyn Maurier, Murray Perelman, Raj Sahni, Susan Seller, Gary Solway, Bill Vass, and Claire Webster.

Directors Duties in Canada 6th ed.

Directors' Duties in Canada, 6th ed.

Leonard J. Griffiths

Environmental Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner

Members of 
 Bennett Jones were involved in the  writing of various chapters of 
<em>Directors' Duties in Canada</em>, 5th ed.,  edited by Barry Reiter and 
 published in Canada by CCH Canadian Limited,  including Hugo Alves, Melissa 
 Birman, Corinne Bordman, Paul Cantor, Duncan Card,  Jane Freeman, Len 
Griffiths,  Martin Kratz, Jeff  Leon, Jesslyn Maurier, Paul Moore, Murray 
Perelman, Raj  Sahni, Susan Seller,  Gary Solway, David Spencer, Bill Vass, 
Claire Webster and  Zach  Justein.

Directors Duties in Canada 5th ed.

Directors' Duties in Canada, 5th ed.

A continuation of the article published in the March 2009 issue of Lexpert magazine, this article discusses the purposes and main components of an effective whistleblower policy and the procedures public companies should follow when reports are received.  Published in the April 2009 issue of Lexpert magazine as part of Barry Reiter's regular column. 

What to do When the Whistle Blows Part II

What to do When the Whistle Blows: Part II

This article discusses the purposes and main components of an effective whistleblower policy and the procedures public companies should follow when reports are received. Published in the March 2009 issue of Lexpert magazine as part of Barry Reiter's regular column.

What to do When the Whistle Blows Part I

What to do When the Whistle Blows: Part I

Ethan Z. Schiff

Class Actions & Commercial Litigation Lawyer

Bobbie Alvernaz

Associate

The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the denial of certification in a proposed class action alleging childhood sexual abuse within Canadian Jehovah&rsquo;s Witness congregations. The Court found insufficient commonality among the proposed class members&rsquo; claims, which involved different perpetrators, congregations and circumstances, and agreed that individual or joinder actions would be the preferable procedure. The decision also distinguishes Gutierrez from other institutional abuse class actions where defendants had a more direct and common relationship with the alleged abuse.

Ontario Court of Appeal Refuses to Certify Institutional Abuse

Ontario Court of Appeal Refuses to Certify Institutional Abuse Class Action With No Common Perpetrator, Activity or Location 

Larissa D. Lees

Regulatory Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Jessica Kennedy

Bennett Jones attended the Data Centre West 2026 Conference in Calgary earlier this month, hosted by the Western Canada Data Centre Alliance, and engaged with representatives from industry, government and regulatory agencies on the issues facing Alberta's rapidly growing digital infrastructure sector. This year, discussions spanned the hyperscale and AI demand outlook, power procurement and grid access challenges, Alberta's regulatory framework, supply chain constraints and labour availability, and sustainability and community engagement, reflecting a sector that has moved well beyond early-stage interest and into active development and investment.

Albertas Digital Infrastructure Moment Has Arrived

Data Centre West 2026: Alberta's Digital Infrastructure Moment Has Arrived

Greg M. Johnson

Energy Tax & Corporate Lawyer | M&A, Reorganizations & PE

Jared A. Mackey

Corporate Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Brendan Sigalet

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

On September 15, 2026, the Canadian federal government announced the "Productivity Mega Deduction" at the first Canada Investment Summit, an incentive that will provide for immediate expensing for the majority of depreciable property, as well as Canadian development expenses, on a permanent basis. The Government of Canada stated that the purpose of the Productivity Mega Deduction is to boost business investment, enhance certainty and simplicity for businesses, and strengthen Canada's tax competitiveness.

Canada Proposes New Productivity Mega Deduction to Spur Investment

From Super to Mega: Canada Proposes New "Productivity Mega Deduction" to Spur Investment

J. Sébastien A. Gittens

Technology Lawyer & Trademark Agent

Tech & Data, National Practice Group Leader 

Suzie Suliman

Commercial Transactions Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Associate, Trademark Agent

Kees de Ridder

Technology, IP & Privacy Lawyer | Patents, Licensing & Cyber

Partner, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has released draft guidance outlining best practices for organizations to assess the privacy practices of third-party service providers under PIPEDA. The guidance emphasizes that privacy due diligence is an ongoing accountability obligation, with particular attention to data flows, AI and training data, security, subcontractors, international transfers and data retention.

OPC Issues New PIPEDA Guidance on Assessing Third-Party Service Providers

Ashley M. White

Corporate & Commercial Transactions Lawyer | Power & Energy

Martin Ignasiak KC

Energy & Industrial Projects Lawyer

Head of Energy Regulatory

Nathan Murray

Energy Regulatory, Environmental & Administrative Lawyer

Canada has amended the Physical Activities Regulations to remove certain intraprovincial energy projects and Canada Energy Regulator-regulated facilities from the federal Impact Assessment Act Project List. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory duplication, timelines and costs while providing greater certainty for proponents, while other federal environmental and emissions requirements remain applicable.

Government of Canada Reduces the Scope of the Project List under the Impact Assessment

Government of Canada Reduces the Scope of the Project List under the Impact Assessment Act

Title Alphabetical

Title

normal

What to do When the Whistle Blows: Part II

From the Same Authors

Directors' Duties in Canada, 6th ed.

Directors' Duties in Canada, 5th ed.

What to do When the Whistle Blows: Part II

Latest Insights

Ontario Court of Appeal Refuses to Certify Institutional Abuse Class Action With No Common Perpetrator, Activity or Location

Data Centre West 2026: Alberta's Digital Infrastructure Moment Has Arrived

From Super to Mega: Canada Proposes New "Productivity Mega Deduction" to Spur Investment

OPC Issues New PIPEDA Guidance on Assessing Third-Party Service Providers

Stay on top of the latest.