• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

CSA Drops Proposed Internal Control Rule

March 10, 2006

Written By Stephen P. Sibold, Q.C.

On March 10, 2006, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) announced that, after extensive review and consultation and in view of the delays and the debate underway in the United States over the rules implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX 404 Rules), the CSA will not proceed with its proposed internal control rule (MI 52- 111 – Reporting on Internal Control over Financial Reporting). This will be welcome news to issuers who were concerned about the costs of compliance with proposed MI 52-111.

MI 52-111 Requirements Similar to SOX Rules

Proposed MI 52-111, as it was published for comment on February 4, 2005, was substantially similar to the requirements of the SOX 404 Rules. Under MI 52-111, management of an issuer would have been required to evaluate the effectiveness of the issuer's internal control over financial reporting, as at the end of the issuer's financial year, against a suitable control framework. In addition, the issuer would have been required to file the following with securities regulatory authorities:

  • a report of management regarding its assessment of the effectiveness of the issuer's internal control over financial reporting, including a statement as to whether the issuer's internal control over financial reporting is effective; and
  • a report of the issuer's auditor prepared in accordance with the CICA's auditing standard for internal control audit engagements.

CSA received considerable feedback from issuers expressing concern over the costs associated with the requirements for a report of management and an internal control audit opinion. In response to the feedback received, the CSA decided not to proceed with MI 52-111 and instead adopted a "made in Canada" approach that will apply in all Canadian jurisdictions.

New Proposed Internal Control Reporting Requirements

The CSA is proposing to expand existing requirements contained in MI 52-109 – Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings to include the following additional provisions in respect of internal control over financial reporting:

  • the CEO and CFO of a reporting issuer, or persons performing similar functions, will be required to certify in their annual certificates that they have evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the financial year. They will also be required to certify that, based on their evaluation, they have caused the issuer to disclose in its annual MD&A their conclusions concerning the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the financial year; and
  • the disclosure required in the MD&A will include a description of the process for evaluating the effectiveness of the issuer's internal control over financial reporting and the conclusions concerning the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the financial year.

Issuers will not be required to obtain from their auditors an internal control audit opinion concerning management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The earliest that these requirements will apply is in respect of financial years ending on or after December 31, 2007. The CSA plans to publish an amended and restated MI 52-109 for comment later this year.

Implications for Issuers

Unlike proposed MI 52-111, the new proposed internal control reporting requirements are expected to apply to all reporting issuers (other than investment funds), including those listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.

Although engagement of an auditor will not be a requirement under MI 52-109, the board of directors and its audit committee will still need to consider whether they wish to engage the issuer's auditor to assist in discharging their responsibilities in respect of the issuer's internal control systems and review and approval of the issuer's annual MD&A.

No Deferral of CEO and CFO Certifications of Internal Control Design

MI 52-109 currently provides that, beginning with financial years ending on or after June 30, 2006, CEOs and CFOs (or persons performing similar functions) are required to certify that they have designed internal control over financial reporting and caused certain changes in internal control over financial reporting to be disclosed in the issuer's MD&A. The implementation of these requirements is not deferred, even though the CSA proposes to implement the requirement to certify the evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at a later date.

Conclusion

This revised approach by the CSA should better balance the costs and benefits associated with the internal control reporting requirements without diminishing the expressed objective of improving the quality, reliability and transparency of financial reporting. It also shows a willingness of the CSA to be responsive to the concerns of reporting issuers over anticipated costs of the initially-proposed internal control rule.

Please note that this publication presents an overview of notable legal trends and related updates. It is intended for informational purposes and not as a replacement for detailed legal advice. If you need guidance tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact one of the authors to explore how we can help you navigate your legal needs.

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

Key Contact

  • Stephen P. Sibold KC Stephen P. Sibold KC, Partner and General Counsel Emeritus

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • Capital Markets

Recent Posts

Announcements

Bennett Jones Wins Big at Benchmark Litigation Awards

May 09, 2025
       

In The News

Managing Risk Amid Tariff Chaos

May 09, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Insights on Tariff Strategy and Cross-Border Trade Compliance

May 08, 2025
       

In The News

John Manley on NPR’s Morning Edition on Mark Carney’s White House Visit

May 06, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Brendan Sigalet on Clean Investment Tax Credits

May 05, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Due Diligence for Tenants at ICSC CANADIAN LAW

May 02, 2025
       

Announcements

Bennett Jones Lawyers Named Among Canada’s Top Litigators By Benchmark Canada

May 01, 2025
       

Announcements

Twenty-Six Bennett Jones Lawyers Ranked in Lexpert's Special Edition on Infrastructure

April 30, 2025
       

Announcements

Jesslyn Maurier Appointed to Ontario Chamber of Commerce’s Board of Directors

April 29, 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones