People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Andrew N. Disipio

Mining & Corporate Finance Lawyer | M&A, Equity & Debt Deals

Partner

Doug Fenton

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Simon Grant

Financial Services & Regulatory Lawyer

Partner 

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal a significant British Columbia case concerning mineral rights, Indigenous consultation and the application of UNDRIP in Canadian law. The decision will address whether courts can determine if provincial and federal legislation is consistent with UNDRIP and could have far-reaching implications for mineral claim acquisition, title certainty and natural resource project development across Canada. The ruling is expected to provide important guidance for mining companies, resource developers and Indigenous communities.

Supreme Court to Hear Landmark Case Involving Mineral Rights and Licensing Regimes

Kristopher R. Hanc

M&A and Capital Markets Lawyer

Brent W. Kraus

Corporate Governance Lawyer | Securities & Capital Markets

Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions Services

Christopher J. Doucet

Corporate & Mining Lawyer | M&A & Corporate Finance

On May 14, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators proposed wide-ranging amendments to Canada&rsquo;s issuer bid, take-over bid and early warning reporting regimes aimed at increasing flexibility, improving transparency around derivatives and reducing regulatory burden. Key changes include a potential selective repurchase exemption, enhanced disclosure for equity equivalent derivatives, and updated guidance on early warning reporting triggers and intentions. The proposals also codify certain exemptions and modernize bid mechanics in light of recent market practice and T+1 settlement.

CSA Proposes Amendments to the Issuer Bid Take Over Bid and Early Warning Regimes

CSA Proposes Amendments to the Issuer Bid, Take-Over Bid and Early Warning Regimes

Geoffrey P. Stenger

Energy, Infrastructure & Construction Lawyer

Alexis Fol

Project Development, Energy and Infrastructure Lawyer at Bennett Jones Montreal

Canada&rsquo;s M&amp;A market entered 2026 with moderated activity but sustained underlying strength, as dealmakers adopted a more selective and strategic approach. Large transactions drove a significant share of total value, with energy, mining and infrastructure leading activity. As regulatory clarity improves and investor confidence builds, the market is well positioned for increased dealmaking through the remainder of the year.

Canadas Q1 2026 MA Landscape

Large Transactions and Sector Concentration Shape Early-2026 Dealmaking

Canada's Q1 2026 M&A Landscape

Sander A.J.R. Grieve KC

Global Mining Finance & M&A Lawyer

Sander Grieve and Andrew Disio examine the policy, regulatory and investment barriers affecting the sector and discuss what is needed for Canada to capture greater value from its mineral resources. They explore the risks of continued reliance on foreign processing and consider how Canada can strengthen its position in an increasingly competitive global market.

Canadian Mining Journal From Endowment to DependenceWhy Canada Still Ships Its Future Offshore

Canadian Mining Journal: From Endowment to Dependence—Why Canada Still Ships Its Future Offshore

Ruth E. Promislow

Privacy, Cybersecurity & AI Lawyer

Stephen D. Burns

Energy & Infrastructure Technology Lawyer | IT/OT & Markets

Partner, Trademark Agent

J. Sébastien A. Gittens

Technology Lawyer & Trademark Agent

On June 4th, 2026, the federal government released <em>Canada&rsquo;s National Artificial Intelligence Strategy: AI for All</em> (the Strategy). The Strategy aims to ensure that artificial intelligence serves Canadians, strengthens businesses and communities and enhances Canada&rsquo;s control over its technological future through six key pillars.

Canadas AI for All Strategy Building Trust Innovation and Sovereignty in the Era of AI

Canada’s AI for All Strategy: Building Trust, Innovation and Sovereignty in the Era of AI

Robert W. Staley

Securities & Commercial Litigation Lawyer | Shareholder Disputes

Vice Chair and Partner

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice&rsquo;s decision in Nivora Group LLC v. Ping et al. clarifies the strict limits on Norwich orders in the context of crypto asset disputes. The Court dismissed a motion seeking third-party disclosure from cryptocurrency exchanges, reaffirming that Norwich relief is an extraordinary remedy available only where it is truly necessary and cannot be used to replace ordinary discovery. Even in cases involving alleged asset tracing, applicants must demonstrate that the third party is the only practicable source of the information and that the interests of justice favour disclosure.

Court Reaffirms Limits on Norwich Orders in Crypto Asset Disputes

The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Chanderpaul v. Caesars Convention Centre Ltd. clarifies when courts may pierce the corporate veil and hold shareholders personally liable for a corporation's wrongful conduct. While reaffirming the high threshold for veil-piercing claims, the decision provides important guidance on the types of conduct that may justify this exceptional remedy.

Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies the Test for Piercing the Corporate Veil

Amanda C. McLachlan

Corporate & Regulatory Lawyer | Disputes, Investigations & Compliance

In <em>Friel v. HUB International Limited</em>, 2026 ONCA 313, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the enforceability of a forum selection clause designating the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for resolving a dispute between a former employee in Ontario and his employer's Delaware-based parent entities over the exercise of vested share options. The decision provides important guidance for employers that structure equity incentive arrangements through related entities and reinforces the significance of clear contractual language delineating employment relationships from equity participation rights.

When Agreements Collide The Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Forum Selection Provision in Friel v HUB

When Agreements Collide — The Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Forum Selection Provision in Friel v. HUB

Edwin G. Kroft KC

Tax Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones

Andrew Young

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Associate

The June 2026 issue of Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes provides insight into recent tax litigation developments, including the Tax Court's decision in 941624 Alberta Ltd. v. The King on the large corporation objection rules, updates from the Taxpayers' Ombudsperson, and summaries of recent tax decisions and appeal activity.

Getting the Deal Through - Mergers & Acquisitions 2017

From the Same Authors