Jenna Vivian was recently interviewed for the Canadian HR Reporter article, "Objective evidence, not bystander reaction, key in workplace psych injuries: Alberta decision." The article discusses an Alberta Appeals Commission decision emphasizing that objective medical evidence, not coworkers’ or bystanders’ reactions, should determine whether a worker has experienced a compensable psychological injury. The case involved a worker who claimed trauma after witnessing a violent workplace incident, but the commission ruled the evidence did not meet the diagnostic criteria required for compensation. Jenna explains that the decision underscores the need for objective medical documentation and reinforces that psychological injury claims must satisfy strict evidentiary and legal standards.
In The News
Objective evidence, not bystander reaction, key in workplace psych injuries: Alberta decision
October 22, 2025
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllBlog
The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference for Spoliation
August 5, 2026 & 1 more
Blog
Dishonesty at the Top: Alberta Court Confirms After-Acquired Cause Can Justify Termination for Cause
January 20, 2026Jenna Vivian
Blog
Just Released: OHS Lessons for Employers from King v. R., 2025 NBCA 12
January 28, 2025Jennifer A. Miller KC, Jenna Vivian & Beth L. Jonah
Latest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
Notice Concerning the Quota for Imports of Chinese Electric Vehicles
September 1, 2026Michael C. Smith & George W. H. Reid
Blog
RSU Forfeiture Revisited: Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers
August 28, 2026Carl Cunningham, David Cassin & Julia Horowitz



















