Title requisitions, and responses to title requisitions, are often evidenced by two simple letters back and forth between solicitors; and yet, in the content of those two letters is the meat of the real estate transaction. Those letters evidence that two solicitors have put their mind to the fundamental issue of whether the seller of the real estate can convey what it bargained to convey in the purchase agreement. Simon Crawford and Carolin Jumaa authored "Please Satisfy Yourself" and presented same at the LSUC's 14th Annual Real Estate Law Summit.
Article
Please Satisfy Yourself
(and other passive aggressive answers to invalid requisitions)
April 3, 2017
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllBlog
No Permit, Big Problems: Building Code Compliance, Implied Terms and Vendor-Builder Liability in Ontario
March 4, 2026Simon P. Crawford & Vanessa Kiraly
Blog
Mixed-Use, Mixed Signals: Why Purchase Price Allocations Matter
February 27, 2026Simon P. Crawford, Dana Talucci & Hennadiy Kutsenko
Blog
Lines in the Sand: A Case of Adverse Possession from Cottage Country
July 23, 2025Simon P. Crawford & Samantha Weng
Latest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
OPC Issues New PIPEDA Guidance on Assessing Third-Party Service Providers
September 14, 2026 & 2 more
Blog
Government of Canada Reduces the Scope of the Project List under the Impact Assessment Act
September 11, 2026Ashley M. White, Martin Ignasiak KC & Nathan Murray
Blog
BC Signs DRIPA Agreement Requiring Simpcw Consent for Yellowhead Copper Project
September 10, 2026 & 1 more




















