• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Capital Projects Energy Funds & Finance Mining View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management ESG Strategy and Solutions Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events New Energy Economy Series
Business Law Talks Podcast Economic Outlook Class Actions: Looking Forward Quarterly M&A Insights
ESG & the CIO Subscribe
People
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
About
Offices
News
Careers
Insights
Law Students
Events
Search
Alumni
Payments
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 
Blog

Lawyers' Opinions Matter When a Will Is Prepared

June 08, 2017

Written By Barbara J. Stratton, Q.C., Sarah J. Huot and Emily M. Hole

When a Will is challenged on the basis of allegations of undue influence, incapacity, or suspicious circumstances, the court will look at various factors to decide if the Will should be followed or declared invalid. These factors include:

  1. Medical evidence of the deceased’s healthcare providers;
  2. Fact evidence of those who knew the deceased. However, the court will be mindful of self-serving statements of those with an interest in the Will and may place less weight on those statements unless they are corroborated or confirmed by other evidence; and
  3. A drafting lawyer’s opinion on capacity and an opinion on whether the deceased’s wishes were his or her own (and not someone else’s). 

Even if a person’s capacity has diminished by reason of age, a court may still confirm the validity of the Will if it is challenged. If this were not the case, the Wills of many elderly people would not be considered valid by reason of the physical and psychological effects of aging. As the Court of Appeal stated in a recent decision, "[t]he suspicion necessary to force a trial putting an entire Will into question requires more than the belief of the disappointed potential beneficiaries" (Beimler v Kendall, 2017 ABCA 117, citing Keller v Luzzi Estate, 2010 ABCA 127 at para 32). 

Download PDF

Authors

  • Barbara J. Stratton KC Barbara J. Stratton KC, Edmonton Managing Partner
  • Sarah J. Huot Sarah J. Huot, Partner
  • Emily M. Hole Emily M. Hole, Associate

Will Osler Takes The Reins As President and Board Chair at the Calgary Stampede

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blog

The Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms the Narrow Confines [...]

June 01, 2023
       

Blog

Ontario's Dismissal for Delay Regime the Year in Review

June 01, 2023
       

Blog

Securities Class Actions Round-Up

June 01, 2023
       

Blog

Developments in General Causation Methodologies for Class Certification

June 01, 2023
       

Blog

The Lack of Present Injuries and Reliable Scientific [...]

June 01, 2023
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
  • History
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2023. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones