• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Background Image
Logo Bennett Jones
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Resources
  • Search
  • Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All

FEATURED AREAS

Energy
Funds & Finance
Mining
Capital Projects
All Industries
Crisis & Risk Management
Environmental, Social & Governance
Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
All Practices
Insights
Media
Events
Subscribe
COVID-19 Resource Centre
Business Law Talks Podcast
Kickstart
New Energy Economy Series
People
Featured Areas
All Practices
All Industries
About
Offices
Careers
Insights
Events
Search
Search
 

Upcoming Policy Projects Announced by the Canadian Securities Administrators

April 09, 2018

Written by Will Osler and Kathryn Shaw

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) announced on March 27, 2018, the initiation of six policy projects aimed at reducing regulatory burdens for non-investment fund reporting issuers. The announcement comes after stakeholders had the opportunity to respond and comment on a CSA Consultation Paper released in April 2017.

The new policy projects include:

  1. exploring potential alternative prospectus models;
  2. facilitating at-the-market offerings;
  3. revisiting the primary business requirements;
  4. removing or modifying the criteria to file a business acquisition report;
  5. revisiting certain continuous disclosure requirements; and
  6. enhancing electronic delivery of documents.

The projects are briefly summarized as follows:

Alternative Prospectus Models

The CSA noted in the Consultation Paper that it was considering an alternative prospectus offering model for reporting issuers with disclosure more concise and focused than under the current short form prospectus regime. Stakeholders provided positive feedback and potential alternative offering models will be researched.

Facilitating At-the-Market Offerings

Reporting issuers wishing to conduct an at-the-market offering must obtain exemptive relief from certain securities legislation requirements. This regulatory burden may account for why there are a limited number of these offerings. Stakeholders suggested that codifying the exemptive relief on at-the-market offerings would not compromise investor protection nor the integrity of capital markets.

Revisiting the Primary Business Requirements

The CSA did not identify revisiting the primary business requirements in its Consultation Paper. These requirements relate to the historical financial statement to be included in an IPO prospectus. However, based on feedback from stakeholders, CSA staff will consider ways in which to provide greater clarity for issuers preparing an IPO prospectus.

Removing or Modifying the Criteria to File a Business Acquisition Report

Preparing a business acquisition report requires significant time and cost, and at times the required information may be difficult to obtain. The CSA will explore ways to reduce this regulatory burden, given reporting issuers frequently apply for and are granted certain relief.

Revisiting Certain Continuous Disclosure Requirements

Recurring themes among commenters regarding existing continuous disclosure requirements included eliminating duplicative disclosure, consolidating financial statements, management's discussion and analysis and the annual information form, and examining if the volume of information in annual and interim filings can be reduced.

Addressing these concerns would enhance the usefulness and comprehensibility of information for investors, while also reducing the burden of disclosure on issuers.

Enhancing Electronic Delivery of Documents

The Consultation Paper noted market participants incur significant costs associated with printing and delivering various documents required under securities legislation. Stakeholders were generally supportive of facilitating electronic delivery and switching the default to electronic delivery.

Conclusion

The six projects will be initiated by the CSA in the near term. Projects have different timelines for completion, but at this time, the CSA has not elaborated on such timelines.

The policy projects are in no way a guarantee that the current regulatory regime will undergo any changes. However, the positive response from stakeholders to the Consultation Paper and the initiation of projects signal the CSA's willingness to adapt to changing market conditions, investor demographics, technological innovation and globalization in an effort to reduce regulatory burden for reporting issuers.

Key Contacts

  • William S. Osler William S. Osler, Partner
  • Kathryn  Shaw Kathryn Shaw, Associate

Read the New Energy Economy Series

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • Regulatory

Recent Posts

In the News

David Dodge and Michael Horgan in Globe and Mail on Fiscal Anchors

February 24, 2021
       

Speaking Engagements

EPC Contract: Love it or Leave it

February 24, 2021
       

Articles

Enforcing Standard-Form Arbitration Agreements in Class Actions: Lessons from the Uber Saga in Canada

February 23, 2021
       

Announcements

Bennett Jones in Chambers Global 2021

February 22, 2021
       

Articles

Michael Smith on 5 Lists Every In-House Lawyer Can Keep

February 19, 2021
       

Articles

Transfer Pricing in the Time of COVID-19

February 19, 2021
       

Speaking Engagements

Jeilah Chan at Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers 2021 Conference

February 19, 2021
       

Announcements

Information Technology Transactions 3rd Edition: An Essential Roadmap for IT Project Success

February 17, 2021
       

In the News

John Manley: Stimulus Spending if Necessary, but Not Necessarily Stimulus Spending

February 17, 2021
       

The firm that businesses trust with their most complex legal matters.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Bennett Jones LLP 2021. All rights reserved. Bennett Jones refers collectively to the Canadian legal practice of Bennett Jones LLP and the international legal practices and consulting activities of various entities which are associated with Bennett Jones LLP

Logo Bennett Jones