• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

USPTO Patent Prioritized Examination

April 27, 2011

In 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) proposed the implementation of certain procedures designed to give patent applicants more control over the timing of the examination of original plant and utility patent applications. Specifically, the USPTO proposed a three-track system whereby applicants could request prioritized examination (Track I), request a delay in the docketing of an application (Track III) or obtain processing under the current examination procedure (Track II) by not requesting either Track I or Track III. The USPTO is still considering and revising the Track III delayed procedure. However, the USPTO intends to implement the Track I procedures immediately.

Accordingly, on or after May 4, 2011, a request for prioritized examination may be submitted with any original utility or plant application. A patent application may be granted prioritized examination status upon satisfaction of the following conditions:

  1. The application must be a new original utility or plant non-provisional application. The procedure does not apply to international applications, design applications, reissue applications, provisional applications and re-examination applications. Prioritized examination of continuing applications (i.e., a continuation or a divisional application) may be requested, provided that each individual continuing application for which the request is made meets the requirements.
  2. The application must be complete including the payment of all applicable fees (basic filing fee, the search fee, the examination fee, any excess claims fees and any application size fee). If it is a utility application, it must be filed via the USPTO's electronic filing system.
  3. The application must contain no more than four independent claims and no more than thirty total claims. The application cannot contain multiple dependent claims.
  4. The application must be accompanied by the prioritized examination fee, the processing fee and the publication fee. The prioritized examination fee has been set at $4000 for all entity sizes. Legislative approval is being sought to eventually halve that fee for small entities.
  5. The request will only be accepted if the number of requests for the given year has not exceeded the maximum permitted amount. The USPTO has set the maximum number at 10,000 applications for 2011.

The USPTO advises that a prioritized application will be accorded special status and will be placed on the examiner's special docket throughout the course of its prosecution. The goal of the USPTO is to reach a final acceptance or rejection of a prioritized application within 12 months of prioritized status being granted.

If you have any questions about the prioritized, Track I application process or about the application process in general, please contact a Bennett Jones patent agent.

Please note that this publication presents an overview of notable legal trends and related updates. It is intended for informational purposes and not as a replacement for detailed legal advice. If you need guidance tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact one of the authors to explore how we can help you navigate your legal needs.

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

Key Contact

  • Simon  Foxcroft Simon Foxcroft, Partner

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • Intellectual Property Law

Recent Posts

Announcements

Bennett Jones Wins Big at Benchmark Litigation Awards

May 09, 2025
       

In The News

Managing Risk Amid Tariff Chaos

May 09, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Insights on Tariff Strategy and Cross-Border Trade Compliance

May 08, 2025
       

In The News

John Manley on NPR’s Morning Edition on Mark Carney’s White House Visit

May 06, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Brendan Sigalet on Clean Investment Tax Credits

May 05, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Due Diligence for Tenants at ICSC CANADIAN LAW

May 02, 2025
       

Announcements

Bennett Jones Lawyers Named Among Canada’s Top Litigators By Benchmark Canada

May 01, 2025
       

Announcements

Twenty-Six Bennett Jones Lawyers Ranked in Lexpert's Special Edition on Infrastructure

April 30, 2025
       

Announcements

Jesslyn Maurier Appointed to Ontario Chamber of Commerce’s Board of Directors

April 29, 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones