David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians.
In The News
Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law Newsletter
June 7, 2016
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllLatest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
Ontario Court Reinforces Finality of Class Proceedings in Rejecting Late Opt-Out Request
July 17, 2026Ethan Z. Schiff & Evana Yukanna
Blog
No Standing Without Specifics: Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms that Cumulative Effects are no Substitute for Evidence
July 16, 2026Martin Ignasiak KC, Tyler McDonough & Logan Lazurko
Blog
C$10 Million Capital Gains Exemption Made Permanent for Employee Ownership Trusts
July 14, 2026 & 1 more

























