• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Private Equity Briefings Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights
Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

The Landmark Decision in Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency

June 27, 2013

On 4 January 2013, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (‘CITT') issued its reasons for the landmark decision in Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency (‘Jockey') respecting Canadian customs valuation  compliance in related party cross-border transactions. The CITT's reasons provide valuable guidance to multinational  companies relating to: (1) the importer's burden of proof to establish the correctness of declared values for duty, particularly as it relates to the nature of the sale for export (i.e., which party is the vendor in the sale for export to Canada), (2) the applicability of the transaction value method of customs valuation, as opposed to alternative methods of valuation, when pricing between a related party vendor and the purchaser in Canada is based on a formulaic transfer pricing policy, and (3) the permissibility of downward adjustments to the price paid or payable to account for post-importation adjustments made in accordance with an accepted transfer pricing policy. (2013 Wolters Kluwer) Global Trade and Customs Journal, Volume 8, Issues 7&8, pp. 209-216

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • International Trade & Investment

Recent Posts

In The News

One Canadian Economy Act: Growing the Energy Sector Together

August 07, 2025
       

Announcements

Twenty-Five Bennett Jones Lawyers Ranked in Lexpert's Special Edition on Energy

August 06, 2025
       

In The News

The Lay of the Land in Energy Dealmaking

August 06, 2025
       

Client Work

Heidelberg Materials Acquires Assets of BURNCO in Edmonton

July 31, 2025
       

Articles

Climate Change Initiatives: Selected Recent Changes and the Application of Existing Tax Principles to Clean Energy—Part 2

July 21, 2025
       

Articles

Tariff Tensions: Managing Risk Through Carefully Drafted Construction Contracts

July 21, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Sabrina Bandali spoke at the 71 Annual Natural Resources

July 17, 2025
       

Client Work

Canada Infrastructure Bank Closes C$1 Billion Financing to Support Montréal-Trudeau Transformation

July 16, 2025
       

In The News

John Manley on the CBC News Network

July 11, 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones