• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

The Landmark Decision in Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency

June 27, 2013

On 4 January 2013, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (‘CITT') issued its reasons for the landmark decision in Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency (‘Jockey') respecting Canadian customs valuation  compliance in related party cross-border transactions. The CITT's reasons provide valuable guidance to multinational  companies relating to: (1) the importer's burden of proof to establish the correctness of declared values for duty, particularly as it relates to the nature of the sale for export (i.e., which party is the vendor in the sale for export to Canada), (2) the applicability of the transaction value method of customs valuation, as opposed to alternative methods of valuation, when pricing between a related party vendor and the purchaser in Canada is based on a formulaic transfer pricing policy, and (3) the permissibility of downward adjustments to the price paid or payable to account for post-importation adjustments made in accordance with an accepted transfer pricing policy. (2013 Wolters Kluwer) Global Trade and Customs Journal, Volume 8, Issues 7&8, pp. 209-216

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • International Trade & Investment

Recent Posts

Client Work

Plains All American Executes Definitive Agreements for C$5.15 Billion Sale of NGL Business to Keyera

June 19, 2025
       

Articles

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes: June 2025

June 18, 2025
       

Client Work

Canadian Pacific Railway Company Closes C$1.4 Billion Debt Offering

June 16, 2025
       

In The News

Canada Needs to Build Economic Resilience: Bennett Jones Economic Outlook

June 16, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Legacy Builders Live Webcast

June 12, 2025
       

Client Work

Bennett Jones Acts for Dow Chemical in Successful $3.56 Billion Contract Claim

June 11, 2025
       

Speaking Engagements

Uncovering the CETA Opportunity

June 11, 2025
       

Client Work

DCM Group, a Thrust Capital Partners Portfolio Company, Acquires Metcor

June 09, 2025
       

Updates

Economic Outlook: Building Resilience and Capacity in a Disrupted World

June 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones