• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo 100 Years
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Capital Projects Energy Funds & Finance Mining View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
View Client Work
Insights News Events
New Energy Economy Series COVID-19 Resource Centre Business Law Talks Podcast
Subscribe
Bennett Jones Centennial Menu
People
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
About
Offices
News
Careers
Insights
Law Students
Events
Search
Alumni
Payments
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 

Fiduciary Law and the Constructive Trust: Perfecting the Fiduciary Undertaking

March 2012

With the welcomed release of two unanimous decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada in Galambos v Perez and Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, the requirements for recognizing fiduciary relationships and obligations have been narrowed and refreshed. Reducing confusion and finally uniting the Court in the area of fiduciary law, Justice Cromwell held in Galambos that all fiduciary obligations must be founded by an undertaking, either express or implied, on the part of the fiduciary to act in the interest of the other party. Where this undertaking provides the fiduciary with a "discretionary power to affect the other party's legal or [substantial] practical interests," the law provides a strict legal framework of liability in accordance with the scope of fiduciary obligations. This undivided direction from the Supreme Court was echoed by Chief Justice McLachlin in Elder Advocates, providing a powerful tool through which to recognize fiduciary relationships and understand the scope of fiduciary duty and liability from the nature of the fiduciary relationship itself. Nevertheless, the "Galambos approach" remains new and incomplete in its application in determining the scope of fiduciary duties and accountability. Published in Alberta Law Review, Volume 49, No. 3.

Key Contact

  • Ciara J. Mackey Ciara J. Mackey, Partner

Spring 2022 Economic Outlook

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Announcements

Steven Bennett Joins Bennett Jones

June 27, 2022
       

Articles

Canadian Tax Foundation: Reimagining the Determination of Tax Avoidance

June 27, 2022
       

In the News

John Manley on Responding to Inflation in Canada

June 24, 2022
       

Articles

What Developments in UNDRIP Mean to Business

June 23, 2022
       

In the News

U.S. Fed Rate Increase Sensible, Although a Bit Late: David Dodge

June 23, 2022
       

Announcements

Lexpert’s Leading Canadian Infrastructure Lawyers

June 22, 2022
       

Announcements

Charlene Hiller Appointed New Director of BC Ferries' Board

June 21, 2022
       

Announcements

Lexpert’s Leading Canadian Tech and Health Lawyers

June 20, 2022
       

In the News

How Canada Can Supply a Resource-Hungry World: Serge Dupont in Toronto Star

June 20, 2022
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer 100 Years
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer 100 Years
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
  • History
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2022. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones