David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians.
In The News
Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law Newsletter
June 7, 2016
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllBlog
The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference for Spoliation
August 5, 2026 & 1 more
Latest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
OPC Issues New PIPEDA Guidance on Assessing Third-Party Service Providers
September 14, 2026 & 2 more
Blog
Government of Canada Reduces the Scope of the Project List under the Impact Assessment Act
September 11, 2026Ashley M. White, Martin Ignasiak KC & Nathan Murray
Blog
BC Signs DRIPA Agreement Requiring Simpcw Consent for Yellowhead Copper Project
September 10, 2026 & 1 more





















