Blog

Abolishment of Limitation Periods for Contaminated Sites in BC Put on Hold

April 22, 2013
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize

In 2012, the government of B.C. passed legislation that would eliminate any limitation period previously applicable to actions to recover the costs of environmental remediation under the Environmental Management Act, S.B.C. 2003, c. 53 (the EMA).  This legislative change was discussed in a prior article on the Bennett Jones Thought Network (Limitation Periods for Environmental Cost Recovery Claims in BC Abolished).

The legislation, which proposed an amendment to the EMA to effectively provide that actions to recover costs for remediation of contaminated sites would not be subject to any limitation period, was originally set to come into force on June 1, 2013, but has been put on hold for now.

The amendment generated significant concerns amongst industry, academic and legal practitioners about the potential uncertainty that would result.  On February 27, 2013, the B.C. Legislature enacted an Order in Council providing that the amendment will no longer come into force on June 1, 2013.  While existing limitation periods for cost recovery actions will remain in place, new provisions in the new Limitation Act coming into force on June 1, 2013, may impact these existing limitation periods, including the ultimate limitation period applicable to cost recovery actions.

If you have any questions about the EMA or the new B.C. Limitation Act and how it may impact you or your business, please contact Wally Braul, Mike Theroux, or Laura Gill.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Peter Zvanitajs at ZvanitajsP@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

From the Same Authors

See All
Insights and Takeaways From Our Top 10 Commercial Litigation Cases of 2022
Blog

Insights and Takeaways From Our Top 10 Commercial Litigation Cases of 2022

February 27, 2023
Michael P. Theroux KCKelsey J. MeyerJaspreet K. Singh
Michael P. Theroux KC, Kelsey J. Meyer & Jaspreet K. Singh
Alberta Court of Appeal Reluctant to Unwind Arrangement Transaction
Blog

What's Done is Done: Alberta Court of Appeal Declines to Unwind Arrangement Transaction Despite Errors in Approval Process

February 1, 2023
Scott H. D. Bower KCMichael P. Theroux KCCiara J. Mackey
Scott H. D. Bower KC, Michael P. Theroux KC & Ciara J. Mackey

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Alberta Expands ASC Powers to Address Financial Misinformation
Blog

Alberta Expands ASC Powers to Address Financial Misinformation

December 23, 2025
William S. Osler KCDenise D. BrightOlu Akinniyi
William S. Osler KC, Denise D. Bright & Olu Akinniyi
Placeholder
Blog

Glow and Grow: What's Shaping M&A in the Beauty Industry

December 20, 2025
Laura JamesRebecca BurnandMadison Sutherland
Laura James, Rebecca Burnand & Madison Sutherland
Ontario Court of Appeal Says that Plaintiffs Cannot Amend Instead of Appeal
Blog

Ontario Court of Appeal Says that Plaintiffs Cannot Amend Instead of Appeal

December 20, 2025
Ethan Z. SchiffMaisah Syed
Ethan Z. Schiff & Maisah Syed