Article

International Fraud Litigation: Should You Consider Arbitration an Alternative?

Lincoln Caylor
December 10, 2015
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize
In the right circumstances, arbitration can provide a time- and cost-effective alternative to fraud litigation that is worth considering, particularly given the growing prevalence of arbitration agreements internationally and the potential risk of fraud or corruption in international business deals. The less public, more flexible nature of the arbitration process are also part of what make it an appealing option. However, though there are benefits, a fraud claimant should also be prepared for the challenges before taking this route toward resolution. View full article here: International Fraud Litigation: Should You Consider Arbitration an Alternative?
Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

From the Same Authors

See All
The Strong Borders Act Seeks to Strengthen the Canadian AML Regime
Blog

The Strong Borders Act Seeks to Strengthen the Canadian Anti-Money Laundering Regime

August 5, 2025
Lincoln CaylorNathan J. ShaheenDylan A. Gallant
Lincoln Caylor, Nathan J. Shaheen & Dylan A. Gallant
Placeholder
Article

Mareva Injunctions in Canada: Now Easier to Get?

June 25, 2025
Lincoln CaylorNathan J. Shaheen
Lincoln Caylor & Nathan J. Shaheen
Placeholder
Speaking Engagement

Lincoln Caylor Speaks on Report Writing in OBA Investigation Series

May 20, 2025
Lincoln Caylor
Lincoln Caylor