People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Mark Rasile

Financial Services Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner

Denise D. Bright

Public and Private Company Financial Transactions and Securities Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Partner 

<a href="/People/R/Rasile-Mark">Mark Rasile</a>, <a href="/People/B/Bright-Denise">Denise Bright</a>, <a href="/sitecore/service/notfound.aspx?item=master%3a%7bD9F01CEE-FA3D-402A-91A9-1F1EBEDA2717%7d%40en">Yannick Beaudoin</a>, <a href="/People/G/Grant-Simon">Simon Grant</a>, <a href="/People/D/Dawson-Karen">Karen Dawson</a>, <a href="/People/S/Shimura-Noriko">Noriko Shimura</a> and <a href="/People/R/Rotchtin-David">David Rotchtin</a> offer an analysis on banking and finance in <a rel="noopener noreferrer" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/banking-finance-2023/canada" target="_blank">Chambers' Banking and Finance 2023 Practice Guide for Canada</a>. Addressing both law and practice and trends and developments, this guide offers detail regarding topics including the loan market, authorization, structuring and documentation, tax, guarantees and security, enforcement, bankruptcy and insolvency and project finance.

BANKING and FINANCE 2023 A Chambers Global Practice Guide Publication

Banking and Finance 2023: A Chambers Global Practice Guide Publication

Preet K. Gill

Restructuring, Insolvency and Complex Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Toronto Managing Partner

David S. Rotchtin

Financial Services and Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

On May 11, 2021, Bill C-274, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Criminal Code Interest Rate) received first reading in the House of Commons. The Bill proposes to amend the definitions of "criminal rate" and "interest" under section 347(2) and repeal section 347.1 which provides exemptions from the criminal interest restrictions in certain limited circumstances.

Significant Changes Proposed to the Criminal Interest Rate

Entering into a loan transaction that also has an equity component, such as the issuance of shares or warrants, has previously given rise to some concern that the loan could ultimately run afoul of the 60 percent criminal rate of interest. While this has widely been thought to be contrary to the intended purpose of the criminal interest provision (preventing loan-sharking), there has still been a risk that equity could be captured and valued as interest due to the broad definition and judicial interpretation of "interest" in that provision. However, that risk has been diminished by a decision of the Ontario Superior Court that was recently upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal.<a name="_ftnref1" href="EditorPage.aspx?da=core&id=%7BC0D7EC62-565D-4439-A962-7EA9A20D1F96%7D&ed=FIELD1417702855&vs&la=en&fld=%7BAF364D18-3608-40E2-9704-4E0D72DB7598%7D&so&di=0&hdl=H1417702884&mo&pe=0&fbd=1#_ftn1"></a>

Equity Kickers and the Criminal Rate of Interest

The Enbridge Northern Gateway Project (Project) involves the construction of two pipelines running from near Edmonton, Alberta, to a new marine terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia. The west-flowing pipeline will carry petroleum for export, and the east-flowing pipeline will import condensate. Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. (Northern) is seeking regulatory approval for the Project. Pursuant to environmental and energy legislation, a Joint Review Panel (JRP) has been established to review the Project and make a final decision on whether or not to approve it. For information and relevant documents, refer to “Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Joint Review Panel,” National Energy Board. Published in the Canada – Oil & Gas section of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter, Volume 29, Number 1, 2012.

Community Hearings on Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Begin

Sarah E. Gilbert

Regulatory, Environmental and Health and Safety Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Julia E. Schatz

Commercial Litigation, Agribusiness, Arbitration, Real Estate, Construction and Environmental Litigation at Bennett Jones Toronto

Gatlin Smeijers

Environmental Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

On December 31, 2025, the Federal Government published the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2025 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. When they come into effect on June 30, 2026, the 2025 Regulations will repeal and replace the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2012. The Federal Government published a proposed version of the 2025 Regulations in 2022 for public consultation.

Federal Government Publishes Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations

Federal Government Publishes Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2025

William S. Osler KC

Capital Markets, Securities, M&A and Corporate Governance Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Drew C. Broughton

Corporate Commercial and M&A Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Audrix Arce

Articling Student

Recent changes to the Commissioner of Lobbying&rsquo;s interpretation of the federal Lobbying Act significantly lower the threshold for mandatory lobbyist registration. As of January 2026, organizations may be required to register if employees collectively spend as little as eight hours lobbying within a four-week period, including preparation and written communications. This update has important compliance implications for corporations and other organizations engaging with federal public office holders.

Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements

Natalia E. Iamundo

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Alixe A.L. Cameron

Corporate Commercial and Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Troy Mack

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Associate

Rights of first refusal and rights of first offer are often used interchangeably, but they carry very different legal consequences in Alberta land transactions. This post explains how Alberta legislation and case law treat each right, why only a ROFR can support a caveat, and what parties should consider when structuring agreements to protect their interests.

Right of First Refusal vs Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions

Right of First Refusal vs. Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions 

Edward (Ted) Yoo

Intellectual Property Lawyer and Canada/US Patent and Trademark Agent at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Partner, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Ahmed Elmallah

Intellectual Property Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Counsel, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Joshua Kim

Articling Student at Bennett Jones in Edmonton

The Alberta Court of King&rsquo;s Bench decision in SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther confirms that intellectual property includes confidential processes, trade secrets and institutional know-how. The Court&rsquo;s injunction highlights the power of confidentiality agreements and the irreparable harm that can result from misuse of confidential information.

Protecting Your Proprietary Information Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

Protecting Your Proprietary Information: Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

Shahrose Javed

Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Andrew L. Jeanrie

Commercial Real Estate and Infrastructure Development Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Inclusionary zoning is a planning tool that requires certain new residential developments to include a prescribed percentage of affordable housing units.&nbsp;IZ was introduced as a unique zoning tool for Ontario&mdash;it would use zoning bylaws not only to dictate the uses permitted in a given area, but also as a tool to control the market price of what that zoning permits. 
<div>&nbsp;</div>

Ontario Moves to Pause Inclusionary Zoning Obligations

Inclusionary Zoning in Ontario: Ontario Moves to Pause Inclusionary Zoning Obligations 

Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Hearings Ongoing

From the Same Authors