• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Background Image
Logo Bennett Jones
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Resources
  • Search
  • Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All

FEATURED AREAS

Energy
Funds & Finance
Mining
Capital Projects
All Industries
Crisis & Risk Management
Environmental, Social & Governance
Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
All Practices
Insights
Media
Events
Subscribe
COVID-19 Resource Centre
Business Law Talks Podcast
Kickstart
New Energy Economy Series
People
Featured Areas
All Practices
All Industries
About
Offices
Careers
Insights
Events
Search
Search
 
Blog

Privacy Enforcement Update: Possible Collaboration Between the Competition Bureau and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner

November 06, 2020

Written by Ruth Promislow, Michael Whitt and Katherine Rusk

In a recent speech, the deputy commissioner for the Competition Bureau's deceptive marketing practices group, Josephine Palumbo, advocated for the reform of Canadian law to permit the sharing of information between her office and the federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC). The current Memorandum of Understanding between the OPC and the Competition Bureau does not cover cooperation as it relates to Canadian federal privacy legislation, and only covers Canada's anti-spam legislation. As a result, the two government entities cannot collaborate on regulation of privacy matters. Ms. Palumbo suggested this was a "lost opportunity" and that it would be particularly useful to share information when the two organizations are targeting the same entity.

This statement by the deputy commissioner follows a flurry of recent activity by the Competition Bureau in connection with privacy issues. In January 2020, the Competition Bureau indicated that it intended to take action when organizations "make false or misleading statements about the type of data they collect, why they collect it, and how they will use, maintain and erase it". Following this stated intention, in May 2020, the Competition Bureau asserted this authority, resulting in an agreement by Facebook to pay a fine of $9 million under the Competition Act in connection with allegations of privacy violations. Shortly thereafter, the Competition Bureau called for increased fines under the Competition Act for privacy violations.

The OPC has also repeatedly called for legislative reform to permit the sharing of information with the Competition Bureau. The OPC advocated for such reform in a November 2017 submission to the Competition Bureau in relation to the discussion paper on 'big data and innovation' and in its 2019-2020 Annual Report to Parliament. In this recent Report, the OPC flagged the incongruity that it is able to collaborate with international partners in circumstances where it cannot do so with Canadian regulators.

Parliament has also considered the issue. In a 2018 report, the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics recommended legislative reform to establish a framework to allow the Competition Bureau and the OPC to collaborate where appropriate. Further, in a 2019 discussion paper regarding the modernization of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, the federal government recommended the exploration of mechanisms to provide for increased cooperation and information sharing between the OPC and other enforcement agencies.

In view of these consistent and repeated calls for reform, it is reasonable to expect there will soon be either legislation or other initiatives directed at allowing the Competition Bureau and OPC to cooperate in the regulation of privacy. Such collaboration will likely mean increased resources devoted to, and greater regulatory scrutiny of, privacy and data security matters.

For more information regarding how to contain regulatory and litigation exposure arising from the management of personal information, contact the Bennett Jones Privacy & Data Protection group.

Authors

  • Ruth E. Promislow Ruth E. Promislow, Partner
  • Michael R. Whitt Q.C. Michael R. Whitt Q.C., Partner, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Read the New Energy Economy Series

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blog

Evidence of Harm Required To Advance Class Action Following Data Breach

February 24, 2021
       

Blog

Site Rehabilitation Program Periods 5 and 6 Further Expand Program Scope

February 22, 2021
       

Blog

Supreme Court of Canada Declines to Hear the Cameco [...]

February 18, 2021
       

Blog

Competition Act and Investment Canada Act Review Thresholds [...]

February 16, 2021
       

Blog

Land Leases for Renewable Energy Projects in Alberta

February 16, 2021
       

The firm that businesses trust with their most complex legal matters.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Bennett Jones LLP 2021. All rights reserved. Bennett Jones refers collectively to the Canadian legal practice of Bennett Jones LLP and the international legal practices and consulting activities of various entities which are associated with Bennett Jones LLP

Logo Bennett Jones