• Take a Pill (or Two)
    January 15, 2010
    New rulings give public companies more tools than ever to defend against hostile takeovers. Published in the January 2010 issue of Lexpert magazine.
  • No Transfer Means No Transfer!
    January 13, 2010
    In Frye v. Frye Estate, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a bequest of shares was valid, notwithstanding that such bequest was clearly contrary to the explicit terms of a unanimous shareholder agreement and letters patent. The decision (wrongly) emasculates broadly drafted share-transfer restrictions, reducing them to near meaningless effect. Published in the January 2010 issue of Canadian Lawyer as part of Bryan Haynes' regular column.
  • Qatari Legal Points to Help Set Up Construction Firms
    January 13, 2010
    With the government committed to spending at least 40 per cent of its current gross domestic product on infrastructure projects and its economy currently in overdrive, Qatar is one of the more attractive jurisdictions in the GCC for construction companies to operate. Published in Emirates Business 24/7.
  • An Update on Securities Class Actions in Ontario: Focusing on the Big Picture Post-IMAX
    January 01, 2010
    Jeffrey S. Leon and Jonathan Bell, "An Update on Securities Class Actions in Ontario: Focusing on the Big Picture Post-IMAX", (2010) Corporate Liability, Volume XV, No. 1.
  • Case Commentary: The Indalex Decision and the Lomas Decision
    January 01, 2010
    Co-authored by Christiaan A. Jordaan. (2010) 15:4 Pension Planning 1050. Two recent Ontario decisions confirmed earlier court decisions on the "deemed trust" issue and the exclusive right of the employer and the pension regulator to initiate plan wind-ups.  
  • Class Arbitration in Canada: The Legal and Business Case
    January 01, 2010
    Jeffrey S. Leon and Rebecca Huang, "Class Arbitration in Canada: The Legal and Business Case", (2010) Canadian Class Action Review, Volume 6, Issue 2.
  • Incurring Flow-Through Share Expenditures
    January 01, 2010
    As a result of the frequent use of flow-through shares ("FTS") by small and medium size corporations, it is vital that certain common pitfalls are avoided. This article will review common issues surrounding FTS, specifically, the timing of incurring Canadian exploration expenditures ("CEEs") and Canadian development expenditures ("CDEs") (collectively, "Qualifying Expenditures"), the type of seismic data which may be renounced to FTS subscribers (the "FTS Holders" or the "FTS Holder"), and the classification of finite and infinite term seismic licenses. Written by Greg M. Johnson and Kyle Rousay; published in Resource Sector Taxation (Vol. VIII, No. 1, p. 555) by Federated Press.
  • Outsourcing Handbook 2010 - Canada
    January 01, 2010
    Duncan Card and Martin Kratz wrote the Canada chapter of Outsourcing Handbook 2010, published by PC Handbooks.
  • Classification of Patient Management Software as Medical Devices
    December 15, 2009
    Health Canada provides the regulatory framework for the lawful sale of drugs and medical devices. However, recent pronouncements by Health Canada classifying software as a medical device has caught much of the health care and vendor communities by surprise. Published in Biotech & Life Sciences Sector E-Book 2010: Strategies for Growth, Survival and Patent Protection by Financier Worldwide.
  • Update: Classification of Patient Management Software as Medical Devices
    December 15, 2009
    On August 31, 2009, the Medical Devices Bureau of Health Canada issued a notice regarding the classification of patient management software as medical devices. Affecting manufacturers, importers, and distributors of patient management software, the notice has caused confusion and concern within the healthcare sector. Published in the December 2009 (Fourth Quarter) issue of HCIM&C.
  • Jeffrey Leon Discusses Risk Mitigation
    December 02, 2009
    Appearing in the Legal Post, Daryl-Lynn Carlson's article, “Managing Risk to Limit Exposure,” examines various means companies can employ to minimize their risk of class action involvement. In the article, Jeffery Leon discusses the strategy of companies acknowledging a problem and moving quickly to deal with it, citing the recent Maple Leaf Foods massive product recall.  Jeffrey states, “Often companies are better off dealing with issues in an up-front way.”
  • Determining the Residence of a Trust - Tax Court of Canada Ruling in Garron et al. v. The Queen
    December 01, 2009
    In Garron et al. v. The Queen, Woods J. adopted a central management and control test in determining the residence of an offshore trust, which is a novel approach in Canadian law and represents a significant departure from the traditional test of residence of the trustee. The case is under appeal and pending the outcome, it will have ramifications for planning predicated on the residence of a trust in a particular jurisdiction.
  • IP Due Diligence - Best Practices
    December 01, 2009
    "IP Due Diligence - Best Practices," was presented at the Canadian Institute's Commercializing Intellectual Property Conference (December 1-2, 2009), Toronto, ON.
  • The Age of Personalized Genomics
    December 2009
    Co-authored by Ciara Toole & Christen Rachul and published in Journal of International Biotechnology Law, Volume 6, Issue 6.
  • An Offer You Can't Refuse?
    November 25, 2009
    When considering whether to accept an offer to join the board of directors of a public company, proper due diligence can help to ensure a happy and valuable experience. Published in the November/December 2009 issue of Lexpert magazine as part of Barry Reiter's regular column.
  • When the Corporate Veil Should Not Be Pierced
    November/December 2009
    The “separate entities” principle established over 100 years ago by the House of Lords in Salomon v. Salomon & Co. is recognized as one of the fundamental principles of English law. Regrettably, in the past couple of decades, a “just and equitable” test has crept into the jurisprudence and been occasionally — but wrongly — applied in determining when to pierce the veil. The result has been uncertainty in the law and a weakening of the principle, which for more than a century has deftly served as a cornerstone of corporate law. Published in the November/December 2009 issue of Canadian Lawyer as part of Bryan Haynes' regular column.
  • Cleantech Licensing Issues
    November 05, 2009
    Martin Kratz presented "Cleantech Licensing Issues" at an LES session in Calgary, AB.
  • Dear Ambassador
    November 04, 2009
    Published in the Opinions section of the Globe and Mail, Allan Gotlieb offers some helpful tips for Gary Dr, Canada's new envoy to the United States. The article can be read at the Globe and Mail's website.
  • Canada Pension Plan: No Service, No Contributions
    November 2009
    Jordan Fremont authored "Canada Pension Plan: No Service, No Contributions", published in Taxation of Executive Compensation and Retirement, Volume 21, Number 4.
  • Osgoode Professional Development's 5th Annual Essential Course on Pensions
    October 27, 2009
    Susan G. Seller wrote a paper entitled "Working with Defined Contribution Plans and other Capital Accumulation Plans: Current Legal Issues" for the Osgoode Professional Development's "5th Annual Essential Course on Pensions".
  • Extreme Benefits Makeover: Employee Time Off for Cosmetic Surgery
    October 25, 2009
    Should employees receive benefits coverage for time off due to cosmetic surgery? At least two Canadian labor arbitrators think so. Published on the Northern Exposure blog.
  • Keeping Your House Clean: Recent Developments in the Liability Exposure of In-House Counsel
    October 21, 2009
    Notwithstanding the increased attention in-house counsel have received of late, the most significant aspect of the law relating to the liability of lawyers who work for organizations in Canada is its absence. There are few cases that assist in defining potential liability: for the most part, Canadian in-house counsel have either conducted themselves appropriately, or flown under the radar.
  • Going Strong, Going Where?
    October 19, 2009
    While individual reform initiatives may be applauded or debated, the collective impact of extensive reform poses fundamental challenges to our governance model, particularly with respect to the appropriate roles of governments, shareholders and directors. Published in the October 2009 issue of Lexpert magazine as part of Barry Reiter's regular column.
  • Recent Trends in Wind Farm Litigation
    October 15, 2009
    Over the past few years there has been a wide array of tort actions commenced in the United States in relation to the acoustic and physical effects that are alleged to be the result of living in close proximity to wind turbines, in addition to proceedings brought to prevent the building of wind farms in the first place. While the outcomes of these proceedings have varied, it is clear that these issues are not likely to go away soon.
  • Who's Protecting Your Privacy Rights
    October 2009
    Recently, Canada's Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart found Facebook violated federal privacy law and had failed to implement corrective measures with respect to four major privacy gaps. Curiously absent from the decision and media coverage was any mention of enforcement action resulting from such findings. Instead, the media reported the privacy commissioner and Facebook were “at odds” but (thank goodness) were “pledging co-operation” and “continuing dialogue.” Published in the October 2009 issue of Canadian Lawyer as part of Bryan Haynes' regular column.

Related Links