Brynne Harding comments on Jonsson v. Lymer in the Alberta edition of Take Five. Brynne was Counsel for The National Self-Represented Litigants Project, the Intervenor in the case.
Brynne says the Lymer decision represents a stride toward equal access to justice for self-represented litigants, who in recent years have been disproportionately affected by the court-fashioned “modern” or common law approach to making vexatious litigant orders.
Take Five is a newsletter of OnPoint Legal Research.
Please note that this publication presents an overview of notable legal trends and related updates. It is intended for informational purposes and not as a replacement for detailed legal advice. If you need guidance tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact one of the authors to explore how we can help you navigate your legal needs.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.