People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Simon P. Crawford

Leading Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner

Vanessa Kiraly

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Associate

In<em> Oliva v. Dickson (2025 ONSC 6666)</em>, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that Building Code compliance can be an implied term of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale and a basis for vendor-builder liability in negligence. Even without structural failure or express contractual representations, failing to obtain required permits may breach both contractual and tort duties. The decision is a cautionary reminder that regulatory compliance defines both legal risk and commercial expectations in real estate transactions.

No Permit Big Problems

No Permit, Big Problems: Building Code Compliance,  Implied Terms and Vendor-Builder Liability in Ontario

Dana Talucci

Corporate Commercial Practice at Bennett Jones Toronto

Hennadiy Kutsenko

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Counsel

A court decision on the sale of mixed-use property highlights the risks of failing to allocate purchase price between residential and commercial portions for HST purposes. The ruling underscores the importance of precise drafting and obtaining representations to avoid uncertainty and tax disputes.

Mixed-Use Mixed Signals Why Purchase Price Allocations Matter

Mixed-Use, Mixed Signals: Why Purchase Price Allocations Matter

Samantha Weng

Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

<p><span>Once again, cottage season is upon us—and like the return of the season, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) has returned to the well-settled law of adverse possession, which continues to surface in modern property disputes where long-term use of a property by an adjoining owner can sometimes erode the ownership rights of the legal owner.</span></p>

Lines in the Sand A Case of Adverse Possession from Cottage Country

Lines in the Sand: A Case of Adverse Possession from Cottage Country

Adam Kalbfleisch

Competition & Regulatory Lawyer | Foreign Investment

Alixe A.L. Cameron

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer

Jane C. Helmstadter

<p><span>The Competition Bureau (Bureau) has released its </span><a href="https://competition-bureau.canada.ca/en/how-we-foster-competition/education-and-outreach/publications/competitor-property-controls-and-competition-act">finalized property control guidelines</a> (Guidelines) outlining the Bureau's ongoing approach to enforcing competition property controls under the <em>Competition Act</em> (Act). These replace the preliminary guidelines published on August 7, 2024, which were subject to a public consultation process last summer/fall</p>

Breaking Ground The Competition Bureau Weighs in with Final Property Control Guidelines

The Competition Bureau Weighs in with Final Property Control Guidelines

Alison G. FitzGerald

International Arbitration Lawyer at Bennett Jones Ottawa

Quinn Scarlett

Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

In Grace et al v. The United Mexican States, the Ontario Superior Court set aside a NAFTA arbitral award on both jurisdictional and arbitrator impartiality grounds, marking a significant development in Canada&rsquo;s international arbitration jurisprudence. The decision clarifies Ontario courts&rsquo; willingness to conduct rigorous review of jurisdictional determinations, scrutinize arbitrator disclosure obligations, and preserve meaningful protections for minority investors and dual nationals in investor-state disputes.<br />
<div>&nbsp;</div>

Ontario Court Sets Aside ICSID Award in NAFTA Arbitration

Ontario Court Sets Aside ICSID Award in NAFTA Arbitration: Key Lessons on Jurisdiction and Arbitrator Impartiality

Mark V. Lewis

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Jacob Mandrusiak

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

This blog examines the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal&rsquo;s decision in Nova Fish Farms Inc. v. Cold Ocean Salmon Inc., holding that &ldquo;time is of the essence&rdquo; clauses do not apply to contractual obligations framed in indefinite terms such as &ldquo;commercially reasonable efforts.&rdquo; The case highlights the legal limits of TOE clauses absent fixed deadlines and underscores the importance of express outside or longstop dates in allocating timing and termination risk in commercial contracts. The forthcoming Supreme Court of Canada appeal may significantly shape future drafting practices for conditional transactions.

Time Of The Essence Clauses And Indefinite Obligations In Commercial Contracts

Nova Fish Farms Inc. v. Cold Ocean Salmon Inc (2025 NLCA 28)

Time of the Essence Clauses and Indefinite Obligations in Commercial Contracts

Ahmed Elmallah

Intellectual Property Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Counsel, Patent Agent, Trademark Agent

Roseann Caldwell

Canadian and United States Patent Agent at Bennett Jones Calgary

Patent Agent

Stephen D. Burns

Energy & Infrastructure Technology Lawyer | IT/OT & Markets

Partner, Trademark Agent

This update analyzes recent Patent Appeal Board decisions to identify trends in the allowance of fintech and financial services patents in Canada. It shows that patentable claims typically frame innovations as technical solutions&mdash;such as improving computing efficiency or integrating specialized hardware&mdash;rather than purely business methods. These trends align with post-Dusome guidance and provide practical insight into how fintech inventions can meet patent eligibility requirements.

Fintech Patents Allowance Trends At The Canadian Patent Appeal Board

Part 2 Fintech Patents: Allowance Trends At The Canadian Patent Appeal Board

Brendan Sigalet

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Greg M. Johnson

Energy Tax & Corporate Lawyer | M&A, Reorganizations & PE

Luke Morrison

Energy Project Development, M&A, and Commercial Transaction Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

The federal government released the Spring Economic Update (SEU) on April 28, 2026, with the stated purpose of advancing its goal of building a stronger, more independent and resilient Canadian economy. Of particular interest to energy and clean-technology businesses, the SEU introduces several measures aimed at accelerating investment in low-carbon infrastructure.

Spring Economic Update Expands Canadas Carbon Capture Tax Credit Regime

Spring Economic Update Expands Canada's Carbon Capture Tax Credit Regime to Include Enhanced Oil Recovery

This update reviews the Federal Court&rsquo;s *Dusome* decision and CIPO&rsquo;s new guidance on patent eligibility for computer-implemented inventions in Canada. It highlights a shift toward purposive claim construction and clarifies that fintech innovations may be patentable where they demonstrate a practical application or improve computer functionality. The guidance offers greater predictability for applicants, particularly in financial technology contexts.<br />
<div>&nbsp;</div>

5th Annual Business Law Summit

From the Same Authors

No Permit, Big Problems: Building Code Compliance, Implied Terms and Vendor-Builder Liability in Ontario

Mixed-Use, Mixed Signals: Why Purchase Price Allocations Matter

Lines in the Sand: A Case of Adverse Possession from Cottage Country

Latest Insights

Ontario Court Sets Aside ICSID Award in NAFTA Arbitration: Key Lessons on Jurisdiction and Arbitrator Impartiality

Time of the Essence Clauses and Indefinite Obligations in Commercial Contracts

Fintech Patents: Allowance Trends At The Canadian Patent Appeal Board

Spring Economic Update Expands Canada's Carbon Capture Tax Credit Regime to Include Enhanced Oil Recovery

Stay Informed. Stay Ahead.