People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Legal

Calgary

Edmonton

Montréal

Ottawa

Toronto

Vancouver

New York

Sean Assié

Regulatory, Environmental and Aboriginal and Indigenous Law Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Partner

Denise D. Bright

Public and Private Company Financial Transactions and Securities Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Partner 

David Bursey

Regulatory, Environmental, ESG and Aboriginal Law Lawyer for Energy and Natural Resource Clients at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Clients across Canada and internationally rely on Bennett Jones for strategic legal guidance in the energy sector. Our inclusion in the Lexpert Special Edition: Energy reflects our deep knowledge of our clients’ businesses in energy-related industries.

Twenty Five Bennett Jones Lawyers Ranked in Lexperts Special Edition on Energy

Twenty-Five Bennett Jones Lawyers Ranked in Lexpert's Special Edition on Energy

Daniel (Dan) R. Chubb

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Luke Stretch

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Associate

In Flowers v Persist Oil and Gas Inc., 2025 ABKB 142,1 the Court of King's Bench of Alberta provides some important reminders to commercial landlords and tenants regarding the growing intersection between real estate and the digital economy. In its decision, the Court of King's Bench ruled that the tenant's operation of a Bitcoin mine was not a permitted use under a surface lease, and granted as remedy a permanent injunction requiring the tenant to remove the Bitcoin mining equipment.

Is The Mining of Bitcoin Permitted Under Your Lease Lessons from Flowers v Persist Oil and Gas Inc

Is The Mining of Bitcoin Permitted Under Your Lease? Lessons from Flowers v Persist Oil and Gas Inc.

Michelle F. Yung

Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

In November 2024, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) released its decision in <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2024/2024bcca387/2024bcca387.html" target="_blank">Centurion Apartment Properties (Scott Road 1) Inc v Piquancy Enterprises Ltd</a>, overturning the lower court’s ruling and setting out principles related to commercial lease enforcement, mitigation, and contractual due diligence.

A Landlords Response and Duty to Mitigate Following a Tenants Repudiation of Lease

Lessons from Centurion Apartment Properties v Piquancy Enterprises

A Landlord's Response and Duty to Mitigate Following a Tenant's Repudiation of Lease

Wesley R. Novotny

Corporate Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Wade Ritchie

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Zachary Thacker

Wesley Novotny, Wade Ritchie and Zachary Thacker write in <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.law360.ca/ca/employment/articles/2300571/a-new-chapter-in-business-succession-the-emergence-of-employee-ownership-trusts" target="_blank">Law360 Canada</a> on Employee Ownership Trusts and the benefits they offer to employees and business owners.

A New Chapter in Business Succession The Emergence of Employee Ownership Trusts

A New Chapter in Business Succession: The Emergence of Employee Ownership Trusts

Lorelei Graham

Food and Agribusiness Lawyer, IP Lawyer, Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Across the Atlantic, the European Union (EU) and its member states have also been encouraging climate-resilient agri-tech innovation, but their approach to intellectual property incentives has been a bit different. The European Union has set ambitious climate goals (like achieving climate neutrality by 2050) and launched the European Green Deal, a broad policy agenda to support sustainable technologies. While funding and regulations (such as support for sustainable farming practices) are big parts of the EU strategy, there is also recognition that IP rights play an important role in fostering innovation. However, unlike Canada or the recent US pilot program, Europe has not implemented a unified “green channel” for patent examination at the European Patent Office.

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part III

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part III: Green Without the Label: Europe's Pragmatic IP Approach to Agri-Tech Innovation

Steven L. Major KC

Commercial Dispute, Construction, Fraud, Police and Personal Injury Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Drew C. Broughton

Corporate Commercial and M&A Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Kevin Myson

Corporate, Commercial Transaction, Energy, Natural Resource and M&A Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Canada is navigating a "wild frontier" in the energy industry, with a unique opportunity to forge successful and sustainable partnerships both domestically and internationally. This was the rallying call at the Energy Business Forum during the 74th Canadian Energy Executive Association (CEEA) conference in Banff, Alberta, where industry leaders gathered to share visions for the future of Canada's energy landscape.

Key Takeaways From the Wild Frontier Energy Business Forum CEEA 74

Key Takeaways From the "Wild Frontier" Energy Business Forum at CEEA '74

Melanie Teetaert

Commercial Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Jennifer (Jenn) K. Choi

Maruska Giacchetto

This article examines the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in J.P. Thomson Architects Ltd. v Greater Essex County District School Board, 2025 ONCA 378, which provides critical clarification on the interpretation of multi-step dispute resolution (MSDR) clauses. MSDR clauses, commonly used in commercial contracts, outline escalating steps such as negotiation, mediation, and arbitration to resolve disputes. The Court addressed ambiguities in the drafting of MSDR timelines, emphasizing that specified timeframes should be interpreted as minimum waiting periods rather than strict deadlines. The decision overturned a lower court ruling that barred a party from arbitration due to a perceived failure to meet a 30-day mediation request deadline. This article highlights the importance of precise drafting in MSDR clauses, discusses the implications of the Court's decision, and provides practical guidance for parties drafting or negotiating dispute resolution provisions in commercial agreements.

Do you need to rush to mediate - Ontario Court of Appeal

Do You Need to Rush to Mediate? Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Interpretation of Multi-Step Dispute Resolution Clause

The United States has long been a major player in both agri-tech innovation and the intellectual property (IP) landscape. In the past, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) offered its own version of a green patent fast-track to encourage climate-friendly inventions. Notably, in 2009 to 2011 the USPTO ran a Green Technology Pilot Program that prioritized examination for certain eco-friendly patents. The pilot ended in 2012, but more recently the USPTO brought back the idea in June 2022, with the Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program, which was essentially an accelerated examination program for patent applications directed to fight climate change. Under this program, inventions designed to reduce or monitor greenhouse gas emissions, including many clean energy, sustainability or climate-smart agriculture innovations, could be examined out of turn. Importantly, like Canada’s program, the US pilot did not charge the usual petition fee for expediting. The goal was to spur green tech by making it faster and cheaper to secure IP rights.

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part II

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part II: Innovation Interrupted: What the End of the USPTO's Green Program Means for Agri-Tech

Climate change is driving a surge in agricultural technology (agri-tech) innovations aimed at making farming more resilient and sustainable. From drought-resistant crops to carbon-capturing soil techniques, these climate-focused agri-tech solutions are crucial for global food security. An often-overlooked piece of this puzzle is intellectual property (IP) strategy, namely how patents and other IP rights are used to protect and incentivize innovation.

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part I

Fast Tracks and Green Gaps Part I: Planting the Future: Why Canada's IP System May Be the Climate Innovation Sleeper Hit

WSP Completes Acquisition of Power Engineers for US$1.78 Billion

Authors


Bennett Jones Client Work WSP Completes Acquisition of Power Engineers for US$1.78 Billion October 1, 2024 Authors Kristos J. IatridisPartner Colin R. PerryPartner John (Jay) A. WintersPartner Zachary ThackerAssociate Christine PlantePartner Luke StretchAssociate WSP Global Inc., a leading global professional services firm, announced that it has completed its previously announced US$1.78 billion acquisition of Power Engineers, Incorporated, a prominent US consulting firm with a leading presence in the power & energy sector. Bennett Jones acted as Canadian legal counsel to Power Engineers. The Bennett Jones team was led by Kristos Iatridis (Corporate) and included Colin Perry (Securities), Jay Winters, Zachary Thacker (Tax), Christine Plante (Employment) and Luke Stretch (Real Estate). Read the transaction press release. Share by Email Social Media Download Download Subscribe Republishing Requests For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com. For informational purposes only This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors. Authors Kristos J. Iatridis, Partner • Co-Head of Commercial Transactions Practice Calgary • 403.298.3285 • iatridisk@bennettjones.com Colin R. Perry, Partner Calgary • 403.298.3419 • perryc@bennettjones.com John (Jay) A. Winters, Partner Calgary, Edmonton • 403.298.8166 • wintersj@bennettjones.com Zachary Thacker, Associate Calgary • 403.298.3105 • thackerz@bennettjones.com Christine Plante, Partner • Co-Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution Department Calgary • 403.298.3242 • plantec@bennettjones.com Luke Stretch, Associate Calgary • 403.298.3030 • stretchl@bennettjones.com