In exploring how mandatory minimums and fines are being treated by the
judiciary, authors Lincoln Caylor and Gannon Beaulne note that it should
go without saying that judicial independence is a cardinal value in
Canada. They argue that judges who ignore the rule of law and make
decisions according to their personal views of justice in the face of
dear legislation to the contrary are not honouring the independence of
the judiciary. Rather, they are assaulting the justice system and
offending the duties of their office. Originally published in Inside Policy - The Magazine of The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (April 2014).
Article
The Case for Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canada
April 2014
Republication Requests
To obtain permission to republish this publication or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.
For Informational Purposes Only
This publication provides an overview of trends and legal updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
From the Same Authors
See AllBlog
The Strong Borders Act Seeks to Strengthen the Canadian Anti-Money Laundering Regime
August 5, 2025Lincoln Caylor, Nathan J. Shaheen & Dylan A. Gallant
Blog
Court of Appeal Certifies Negligence Claim Against Gun Manufacturer for Mass Shooting
July 22, 2025Gannon Beaulne, Thomas Feore & Maisah Syed
Latest Insights
See All Insights See AllBlog
The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference for Spoliation
August 5, 2026Ethan Z. Schiff
Blog
Ontario Court Reinforces Finality of Class Proceedings in Rejecting Late Opt-Out Request
July 17, 2026Ethan Z. Schiff & Evana Yukanna
Blog
No Standing Without Specifics: Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms that Cumulative Effects are no Substitute for Evidence
July 16, 2026Martin Ignasiak KC, Tyler McDonough & Logan Lazurko





















