Article

Brynne Harding on Jonsson v. Lymer

August 21, 2020
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize

Brynne Harding comments on Jonsson v. Lymer in the Alberta edition of Take Five. Brynne was Counsel for The National Self-Represented Litigants Project, the Intervenor in the case.

Brynne says the Lymer decision represents a stride toward equal access to justice for self-represented litigants, who in recent years have been disproportionately affected by the court-fashioned “modern” or common law approach to making vexatious litigant orders.

Take Five is a newsletter of OnPoint Legal Research.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Bryan Canning at canningb@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

From the Same Authors

See All
Placeholder
Article

Court of Appeal tells Regulators to Pony Up for Disciplinary Proceedings

August 15, 2023
Brynne HardingTyler McDonough
Brynne Harding & Tyler McDonough
National R and D A Cautionary Tale about Expert Evidence
Blog

National R&D: A Cautionary Tale about Expert Evidence

May 31, 2022
Brynne HardingDavid J. Wahl, FCIArb
Brynne Harding & David J. Wahl, FCIArb

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Prop Tech Patents And Patent Litigation
Blog

Proptech: Patents and Patent Litigation

March 7, 2026
Natalia E. IamundoBenjamin K. ReingoldAhmed Elmallah
Natalia E. Iamundo, Benjamin K. Reingold & Ahmed Elmallah