Article

Ontario Court of Appeal Considers the Law Regarding Penalty Clauses

January 1, 2008
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize
Co-authored by Christiaan A. Jordaan. (2008) 13:1 Commercial Litigation 684. Courts have historically shown reluctance to enforce contractual clauses that impose particularly onerous consequences on a party that breaches the contract. Two different streams of jurisprudence developed to address this issue: common law courts developed the "penalty" doctrine, while courts of equity developed the doctrine of relief from forfeiture. While closely related, the two doctrines would not necessarily lead to the same result in similar circumstances. Two recent decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal suggest the possibility of a harmonization of these doctrines in a manner that would create greater predictability in the law and would better respect freedom of contract.
Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Peter Zvanitajs at ZvanitajsP@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements
Blog

Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements

February 6, 2026
William S. Osler KCDrew C. BroughtonAudrix Arce
William S. Osler KC, Drew C. Broughton & Audrix Arce
Protecting Your Proprietary Information Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther
Blog

Protecting Your Proprietary Information: Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

February 5, 2026
Edward (Ted) YooAhmed ElmallahJoshua Kim
Edward (Ted) Yoo, Ahmed Elmallah & Joshua Kim