![]() In The News Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law NewsletterJune 7, 2016 Authors David BurseyPartner Shawn M. MunroPartner Michael P. Theroux KCPartner David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians. Republishing Requests For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com. For informational purposes only This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors. AuthorsDavid Bursey, Partner • Co-Head of Aboriginal Law Practice Vancouver • 604.891.5128 • burseyd@bennettjones.com Shawn M. Munro, Partner Calgary • 403.298.3481 • munros@bennettjones.com Michael P. Theroux KC, Partner • Co-Head of Commercial Litigation Practice Calgary • 403.298.4438 • therouxm@bennettjones.com |