In The News

Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law Newsletter

June 7, 2016
Authors
David BurseyPartner
Shawn M. MunroPartner
Michael P. Theroux KCPartner

David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Authors

David Bursey, Partner   •   Co-Head of Aboriginal Law Practice
Vancouver  •   604.891.5128   •   burseyd@bennettjones.com
Shawn M. Munro, Partner
Calgary  •   403.298.3481  •   munros@bennettjones.com
Michael P. Theroux KC, Partner   •   Co-Head of Commercial Litigation Practice
Calgary  •   403.298.4438  •   therouxm@bennettjones.com