Ranjan Agarwal examines the Federal Court of Appeal's decisions in Canada
(AG) v. Johnstone and Canadian National Railway Company v. Seeley, which
find that the ground of family status under the Canadian Human Rights Act
extends to parental obligations, but places limits on the scope of the duty to
accommodate through the test for a prima facie case of discrimination. Published in Volume XX, No. 4 in Charter and Human Rights Litigation by Federated Press.
Article
Family Status and Childcare Responsibilities
July 2014
Republishing Requests
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.
For informational purposes only
This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
Latest Insights
See All InsightsBlog