Class actions are widely recognized to raise ethical issues for class counsel because of the lack of a traditional client. However, issues for defence counsel may also arise. Most notably, communications with class members can raise problems – particularly when defendants and their counsel may be keen to avoid a class action by early settlement or the creation of an alternate claims procedure. Fortunately, the recent decisions in Lundy v VIA Rail Canada Inc and Durling v Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc have clarified the obligations that arise in these circumstances, and provide guidance in navigating the ethical boundary successfully. Co-authored by Michael A. Eizenga and Christiaan A. Jordaan, and published in the Barreau du Québec's Colloque National Sur Les Recours Collectifs: Développements Récents au Québec, au Canada et aux États-Unis.
For informational purposes only
This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.
Authors
Michael A. Eizenga L.S.M., Partner • Co-Head of Class Actions Practice
Toronto, Vancouver • 416.777.4879 • eizengam@bennettjones.com