Blog

Avoiding Self-Incrimination in Canada

December 17, 2012
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize

It is increasingly common for counsel to find themselves dealing with a civil action in which one party may be facing criminal or regulatory sanctions arising from the same events underlying the civil action. For example, a defendant may be charged in criminal or regulatory proceedings for insider trading or tipping and may also be defending a civil action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. Similarly, a company may commence a civil action against a former employee to recover stolen funds while that individual faces criminal fraud charges. These issues may also arise in personal injury, antitrust and environmental litigation. The Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in R v Nedelcu raises some complex and difficult issues for counsel on the use of civil evidence in subsequent criminal proceedings. Read the full article by Jeffrey S. Leon, Ranjan K. Agarwal and Stephen N. Libin on the full Bennett Jones website.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Canadas Q3 2025 MA Landscape
Blog

Canada's Q3 2025 M&A Landscape

October 16, 2025
Kwang LimAngela BlakeLaura James
Kwang Lim, Angela Blake & Laura James
The Implications of AI on Performance Marketing
Blog

The Implications of AI on Performance Marketing

October 9, 2025
Benjamin K. ReingoldStephen D. Burns
Benjamin K. Reingold & Stephen D. Burns