Article

Capable of Producing Interpreted by Alberta Court of Appeals

November 2011
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize
A recent decision from the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld the rejection of the "paying quantities" paradigm commonly applied in American jurisprudence when considering the shut-in well clause contained in the 1991 Canadian Association for Petroleum Landmen standard form freehold case. Omers Energy Inc. v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board), 2011 ABCA 251. Nevertheless the Court of Appeal expressly supports the underlying rationale of the "paying quantities" paradigm and has thus potentially opened the door for future decisions to incorporate such paradigm when interpreting shut-in well clauses. Published in the Canada – Oil & Gas section of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter, Volume 28, Number 4, 2011.   
Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Peter Zvanitajs at ZvanitajsP@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Canadas AI Efforts in 2025 A Year in Review
Blog

Canada's AI Efforts in 2025: A Year in Review

December 12, 2025
Stephen D. BurnsBenjamin K. ReingoldDavid Wainer
& 1 more
Alberta Aligns with Other Provinces in Extending Long Term Illness and Injury Leave
Blog

Alberta Aligns with Other Provinces in Extending Long Term Illness and Injury Leave

December 12, 2025
Laura InglisChristine PlanteDavid M. Price
Laura Inglis, Christine Plante & David M. Price
Placeholder
Blog

Health Canada Proposes Amendments to MDEL Holders and Applicants

December 9, 2025
Ashley L. PatersonMorgan Sutherland
Ashley L. Paterson & Morgan Sutherland