Blog

Understanding the CUSMA/USMCA: A Look at the Uniform Regulations and New Canadian Guidance

July 09, 2020

Close

Written By Sabrina A. Bandali and Jessica Horwitz

After months of anticipation by the Canadian trading community, and just days before the agreement's entry into force on July 1, implementation details were published for the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA, also known as the USMCA or T-MEC). Companies with North American supply chains will now need to consider this guidance to determine how to leverage the opportunities presented by the new Agreement.

We provided an overview of the Agreement's key new elements in previous blog posts: Introducing the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and NAFTA "2.1"—The Amended and Final Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement. As the 2,300+ pages of the Agreement and nearly 200 pages of Uniform Regulations suggest, the devil is very much in the details when it comes to free trade agreements. Canadian businesses that have claimed NAFTA tariff preference or provided NAFTA certificates of origin to customers in the past should conduct a comprehensive review of their operations and supply chains as soon as possible to confirm that they meet the rules of origin, and that they are satisfying the operational and compliance requirements to claim preferential tariff treatment under the new Agreement. Businesses should not assume that goods would still qualify under the CUSMA just because they qualified under the NAFTA. We provide a resource list at the end of this post of the various publications that provide additional guidance on how Canada will administer the trade pact.

Key Clarifications in the New Uniform Regulations

Chief among the recently published resources are the Uniform Regulations on the interpretation of rules of origin and origin procedures negotiated among the three CUSMA member states. The Uniform Regulations provide important details about the how customs authorities will interpret and administer the rules contained in the Agreement’s text. Key changes clarified in the Uniform Regulations include, among other things:

Special Notes for the Automotive Industry

The automotive industry is particularly affected by the change from NAFTA to CUSMA. The Uniform Regulations contain:

The CUSMA introduces certain steel and aluminum content requirements for originating automotive goods. The Uniform Regulations specify the types of steel and aluminum products that qualify for purposes of this threshold (Section 17 and "Table S" of the Uniform Regulations) and the permissible methods for calculating their value, including rules about time periods and aggregation across categories of vehicles. The Uniform Regulations clarify that the steel and aluminum content requirement applies only to purchases of (or self-produced) inputs by the vehicle producer for use in the production of passenger vehicles, light trucks or heavy trucks; the requirement does not apply to the production of other types of vehicles or for tools and equipment.

Although the Uniform Regulations address the calculation methodology for the new labour value content requirement for passenger vehicles (Section 18), they do not contain any illustrative calculation examples for this requirement, and how it will be applied in practice remains somewhat unclear.

The Uniform Regulations clarify that importers of vehicles and auto parts will receive additional time to respond to origin verification information requests concerning those goods until December 31, 2020.

Looking Ahead

The culmination of nearly three years of negotiation, renegotiation and procedural detailing, the CUSMA's entry into force—and the publication of its administrative procedures—are a relief for Canadian businesses desperate to regain equilibrium in their North American trading relationships. However, trade uncertainty remains, particularly the risk of resumed U.S. "section 232" national security tariffs against Canadian metal exports and the corresponding risk of Canadian retaliatory countermeasures against imports of the same categories of U.S. goods, or new actions in respect of other products.

Importers that claim duty benefits under a free trade agreement bear the burden of documenting and demonstrating to customs authorities that the goods qualify for preferential treatment. Failing to meet these compliance obligations may result in hefty duty reassessments or commercial disputes with trading partners. In deciding whether to claim preferential treatment under a free trade agreement, businesses must weigh the potential benefits against the risk and costs of compliance.

Government of Canada Publications and Other Resources

The following is a non-exhaustive list of recent Government of Canada instruments and publications that contain important information for importers and exporters on the Agreement implementation:

Uniform Regulations

Customs Notices

CBSA D-Memos

Orders in Council

TRQ Information

Other New Regulations and Regulatory Amendments

For advice and assistance in understanding what the new North American trade agreement, CUSMA, and the above changes mean for your business, please contact a member of the Bennett Jones International Trade and Investment group.

Authors

Related Links



View Full Mobile Experience