• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Background Image
Logo Bennett Jones
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Resources
  • Search
  • Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All

FEATURED AREAS

Energy
Funds & Finance
Mining
Capital Projects
All Industries
Crisis & Risk Management
Environmental, Social & Governance
Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
All Practices
Insights
Media
Events
Subscribe
COVID-19 Resource Centre
Business Law Talks Podcast
Kickstart
New Energy Economy Series
People
Featured Areas
All Practices
All Industries
About
Offices
Careers
Insights
Events
Search
Search
 

Norwich Orders

August 11, 2011

A party does not always have all of the necessary information available to make an informed decision to start a lawsuit. This can arise where anonymous and defamatory e-mails have been sent, where a device that may infringe a patent is not publicly available, or where financial records that demonstrate the nature and extent of a fraud are exclusively in the hands of a bank.

Courts have fashioned a mechanism to compel innocent third parties to provide documents and information to a potential plaintiff for the purposes of starting a lawsuit. This remedy is available where the applicant believes it has been wronged and needs the third party's assistance to determine how to pursue its legal remedies.

Commonly known as a Norwich order, this procedure is a valuable tool in litigation where critical information is unknown and is necessary to properly consider whether litigation should be commenced.

Taking its name from Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise,1 the original Norwich order permitted a pharmaceutical company to obtain the identity of a party secretly importing the company's drug, which was patent-protected, from the customs authorities. In requiring the third-party customs authorities to disclose the identity of the unknown drug smuggler, the House of Lords stated: "A person who gets mixed up in the tortious acts of others so as to facilitate their wrong-doing...may incur no personal liability but he comes under a duty to assist the person who has been wronged by giving him full information and disclosing the identity of the wrongdoers."

Canadian courts have imported the Norwich order. When faced with an application for a Norwich order, the court will consider whether:

(a) the applicant has shown a valid, bona fide or reasonable claim;

(b) the applicant has established that the third party from whom information is sought is somehow involved in the acts complained of;

(c) the third party is the only practicable source of the information; and

(d) the interests of justice favour the obtaining of disclosure from the third party.

Norwich orders have been frequently granted where a bank is in receipt of funds allegedly procured by fraud. In such a case, the Court has held that the bank is involved in the case because without its involvement the wrongful receipt and possible transfer of funds could not have occurred. It is the confidential information possessed by the bank that will lead the applicant to the information required to determine whether a legal proceeding is appropriate.

Norwich orders have also been granted to obtain the identity of persons using Gmail, Google's free, Internet-based e-mail service, to send anonymous and defamatory e-mails. As with the banks, there is no claim that Google or the Internet service provider is complicit in the wrongdoing, rather the facilitation of the anonymous communications amounts to an involvement beyond being a mere witness. Particularly in cases such as this, it is unlikely that the applicant could ever learn the identity of the potential defendant by any other means than disclosure from Google and/or the Internet service provider.

Norwich orders are not granted lightly. The court is required to balance the benefit to the applicant of revealing the desired information against the prejudice to the alleged wrongdoer in releasing the information. The Court will consider the nature of the information sought, the degree of confidentiality accorded to the information by the party against whom the order is sought, and the degree to which the requested order curtails the use to which the information can be put. Courts will also consider constitutional issues, such as freedom of expression, when faced with such a motion.

Lawyers at Bennett Jones have considerable experience in obtaining Norwich orders in a broad range of matters.


Notes
  1. [1974] A.C. 133 (H.L.) at 175

Read the New Energy Economy Series

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Related Expertise

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Intellectual Property Litigation

Recent Posts

Speaking Engagements

EPC Contract: Love it or Leave it

February 24, 2021
       

Articles

Enforcing Standard-Form Arbitration Agreements in Class Actions: Lessons from the Uber Saga in Canada

February 23, 2021
       

Announcements

Bennett Jones in Chambers Global 2021

February 22, 2021
       

Articles

Michael Smith on 5 Lists Every In-House Lawyer Can Keep

February 19, 2021
       

Articles

Transfer Pricing in the Time of COVID-19

February 19, 2021
       

Speaking Engagements

Jeilah Chan at Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers 2021 Conference

February 19, 2021
       

Announcements

Information Technology Transactions 3rd Edition: An Essential Roadmap for IT Project Success

February 17, 2021
       

In the News

John Manley: Stimulus Spending if Necessary, but Not Necessarily Stimulus Spending

February 17, 2021
       

Announcements

ESG Series: Defining and Driving ESG Within Your Organization

February 11, 2021
       

The firm that businesses trust with their most complex legal matters.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Bennett Jones LLP 2021. All rights reserved. Bennett Jones refers collectively to the Canadian legal practice of Bennett Jones LLP and the international legal practices and consulting activities of various entities which are associated with Bennett Jones LLP

Logo Bennett Jones