• About
  • Events
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Media
Background Image
Bennett Jones
  • People
  • Services
  • Experience
  • Insights
Search By:
 
Find a Person
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z all
People
Services
Experience
Insights
Offices
About
Media
Search
Aboriginal Law
Accountant Liability Litigation
Agribusiness, Food & Beverage
Anti-Spam Law
Appellate Advocacy & Judicial Review
Arbitration
Asset/Equipment Finance & Leasing
Aviation
Banks & Financial Institutions
Bermuda & Caribbean
Biotech, Pharma & Lifesciences
Cannabis Law
China
Class Action Litigation
Climate Change
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Transactions
Competition/Antitrust
Constitutional Law
Construction
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Cybersecurity
Defamation
Defence & Security
Employment Services
Energy
Energy Litigation
Environmental Law
Estate Litigation
Financial Services
Fintech & Blockchain
Forestry
Franchising
Fraud Law
Gaming & Hospitality
Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
Health Law
India
Infrastructure & Project Development
Intellectual Property Law
Intellectual Property Litigation
International Arbitration
International Trade & Investment
IT & Business Services
Mergers & Acquisitions
Middle East & North Africa
Mining
Oil & Gas
Payment Solutions
Pensions & Benefits
Power & Renewables
Privacy & Data Protection
Private Equity & Capital Funds
Procurement & Outsourcing
Product Liability
Product Regulation
Project Finance
Property Development & Real Estate
Regulatory
Restructuring & Insolvency
Retail
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Activism & Critical Situations
Structured Finance & Asset Securitization
Tax
Tax Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Technology Law
Technology, Media & Entertainment
Trading & Derivatives
Transfer Pricing
Transportation
United States of America
Venture Capital
Wills, Estates & Trusts
 

Blog

Oil Producers Win Another Round in U.S. Climate Change Litigation

July 26, 2018

Contact Us
 
Subscribe
Print
Share
Share
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Written by Michael P. Theroux, Laura M. Gill, Thomas W. McInerney and Parker Mckibbon

On July 19, 2018, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an emerging trend in federal jurisprudence by dismissing a claim against several oil and gas producers in City of New York v. BP PLC, Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Royal Dutch Shell, PC, No. 18 Civ. 182 (S.D. N.Y. July 19, 2018) [BP PLC]. The plaintiff, the City of New York, sought "compensatory damages for past and future costs incurred by the City to protect its infrastructure and property and to protect the public health, safety, and property of its residents from the impacts of climate change."

This action is one of several lawsuits in the United States against oil and gas producers. This decision follows our recent blog, Oil Producers Succeed in California Climate Change Action, which discusses a similar decision out of the Northern District of California (The City of Oakland v. BP, Chevron and Others, No. 17-CV-0611 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2018) [Oakland]), where the Court also dismissed a climate change related complaint.

Summary of Decision

The City is alleging that the impacts of climate change are a public and private nuisance and a trespass. The City cites rising sea levels, heat related concerns and infrastructure costs as evidence of the harm arising from climate change.

The producers brought an application to dismiss the city's claim. The Court dismissed the complaint using similar reasoning to the Oakland decision. This included holding that the Clean Air Act displaces federal common law claims for alleged harm due to greenhouse gas emissions and that this type of decision-making is better suited for the legislative and executive branches rather than the judiciary.

Takeaways

This decision is yet another victory for oil and gas producers in climate change litigation. However, the City of New York has announced that it will appeal the decision. We expect that at least two appellate level courts will be asked to determine the validity of the lower court's dismissal of such claims.

Subscribe
Share
Share      
 
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
 

Authors

  • Michael P. Theroux Michael P. Theroux, Partner
  • Laura M. Gill Laura M. Gill, Partner
  • Thomas W. McInerney Thomas W. McInerney, Partner

Looking Forward: Class Actions in 2019

Download now

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blog

Expedited Proceedings at Canada’s Competition Tribunal

February 15, 2019
       

Blog

Health Canada Guidance on Cannabis Recalls

February 14, 2019
       

Blog

The Business Council of Canada’s Task Force on Canada’s [...]

February 14, 2019
       

Blog

CBCA Private Corporations Subject to New Shareholder [...]

February 11, 2019
       

Blog

Curtailment Rules Come Into Force for Production of [...]

February 06, 2019
       

Firm Information

  • People
  • About
  • Recruitment
  • Anti-Spam Learning Centre
  • Kickstart
  • Client Extranet

Offices

  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
  • United States of America
  • Beijing
  • Doha

Stay Connected

Careers

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Bennett Jones LLP 2019 All rights reserved. Bennett Jones refers collectively to the Canadian legal practice of Bennett Jones LLP and the international legal practices and consulting activities of various entities which are associated with Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones