• About
  • Events
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Media
Background Image
Bennett Jones
  • People
  • Services
  • Experience
  • Insights
Search By:
 
Find a Person
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z all
People
Services
Experience
Insights
Offices
About
Media
Search
Aboriginal Law
Accountant Liability Litigation
Agribusiness, Food & Beverage
Anti-Spam Law
Appellate Advocacy & Judicial Review
Arbitration
Asset/Equipment Finance & Leasing
Aviation
Banks & Financial Institutions
Bermuda & Caribbean
Biotech, Pharma & Lifesciences
Cannabis Law
China
Class Action Litigation
Climate Change
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Transactions
Competition/Antitrust
Constitutional Law
Construction
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Cybersecurity
Defamation
Defence & Security
Employment Services
Energy
Energy Litigation
Environmental Law
Estate Litigation
Financial Services
Fintech & Blockchain
Forestry
Franchising
Fraud Law
Gaming & Hospitality
Governmental Affairs & Public Policy
Health Law
India
Infrastructure & Project Development
Intellectual Property Law
Intellectual Property Litigation
International Arbitration
International Trade & Investment
IT & Business Services
Mergers & Acquisitions
Middle East & North Africa
Mining
Oil & Gas
Payment Solutions
Pensions & Benefits
Power & Renewables
Privacy & Data Protection
Private Equity & Capital Funds
Procurement & Outsourcing
Product Liability
Product Regulation
Project Finance
Property Development & Real Estate
Regulatory
Restructuring & Insolvency
Retail
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Activism & Critical Situations
Structured Finance & Asset Securitization
Tax
Tax Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Technology Law
Technology, Media & Entertainment
Trading & Derivatives
Transfer Pricing
Transportation
United States of America
Venture Capital
Wills, Estates & Trusts
 

Blog

No Deemed Trust for Unremitted GST and HST Post-Bankruptcy

November 13, 2018

Contact Us
 
Subscribe
Print
Share
Share
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Written by Kelsey J. Meyer and Raj S. Sahni

In a unanimous decision issued November 8, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada granted the appeal of the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada v Callidus Capital Corp, 2017 FCA 162. Secured creditors who receive proceeds of secured assets prior to the bankruptcy of a debtor are no longer held personally liable after the bankruptcy of the debtor for deemed trust claims of Canada Revenue Agency for unremitted GST and HST. The Supreme Court answered "yes" to the question before it, assuming the existence of a pre-bankruptcy liability for unremitted GST and HST under section 222 of the Excise Tax Act, RSC 1985 c E-15 (ETA):

Does the bankruptcy of a tax debtor and section 222(1.1) of the ETA as amended render the deemed trust under section 222 of the ETA ineffective as against a secured creditor who received, prior to bankruptcy, proceeds from the assets of the tax debtor that were deemed to be held in trust for the plaintiff?

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision overturns the majority decision of the Federal Court of Appeal, which held that secured creditors were required to pay proceeds derived from a section 222 deemed trust and were personally liable to the Crown, regardless of the subsequent bankruptcy of the debtor. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, for the reasons of the dissenting judge at the Federal Court of Appeal, Justice Pelletier. 

Justice Pelletier's dissenting reasons found that the trust created by subsection 222(3) of the ETA lapsed due to lack of subject matter by operation of subsection 222(1.1) of the ETA following the bankruptcy of the debtor. Justice Pelletier held that if no amounts were deemed to be held in trust pursuant to subsection (1), then no subsection (3) trust arises. Pursuant to subsection 222(1.1), at or after the time of bankruptcy, subsection 222(1) does not apply to any amounts that were collected on account of tax prior to that time, with the result that after bankruptcy, there is no amount deemed to be held in trust pursuant to subsection (1) for amounts collected as tax but not remitted pre-bankruptcy. As of the date of the bankruptcy, there were no amounts subject to the subsection 222(1) trust and therefore no property of the debtor subject to a deemed trust pursuant to subsection 222(3) of the ETA. As a result, no proceeds of that property were payable to the Crown by Callidus Capital Corporation, a secured creditor of the debtor.

The Supreme Court did not, however, determine whether subsection 222(3) of the ETA can create a personal liability for secured creditors where there is no bankruptcy. In a relatively recent decision of the Federal Court in Canada v Toronto-Dominion Bank delivered on May 25, 2018, the Federal Court held that funds which the bank had received from a mortgage debtor upon repayment of the mortgage were subject to a deemed trust under section 222 of the ETA, as they were proceeds of property (a house) that were subject to the deemed trust in respect of unremitted GST owing from the debtor's landscaping business.

Interestingly, in the Toronto-Dominion Bank case, the bank was not aware of the GST debt at the time it received the funds, and the payment to the bank was not related to the debtor's landscaping business under which the GST debt had accrued but was instead a repayment of the debtor's personal line of credit and mortgage on his home. Nonetheless, the Federal Court held that debtor's house was impressed with a deemed trust under section 222 and the bank, being the recipient of proceeds from the sale of that home, was obligated to pay those proceeds to the Receiver General under section 222 of the ETA and section 227 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985 c 1 (5th Supp.). The Federal Court relied in part on the Federal Court of Appeal's majority decision in Callidus in its reasons.

Since the debtor in the Toronto-Dominion Bank case was not bankrupt, and since the Supreme Court of Canada did not determine, in Callidus, whether subsection 222(3) of the ETA can create a personal liability for secured creditors where there is no bankruptcy of the debtor, lenders should be aware that they could still have personal liability for repayment of property or proceeds impressed with a GST/HST deemed trust where the debtor has not become bankrupt.

Raj Sahni and Kelsey Meyer are members of the Bennett Jones Insolvency and Restructuring Group. If you have any questions about the above or are in need of legal counsel regarding insolvency issues, please contact Kelsey Meyer, Raj Sahni or another member of Bennett Jones' Insolvency and Restructuring Group.

Subscribe
Share
Share      
 
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
 

Authors

  • Kelsey J. Meyer Kelsey J. Meyer, Partner
  • Raj S. Sahni Raj S. Sahni, Partner

Looking Forward: Class Actions in 2019

Download now

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blog

Expedited Proceedings at Canada’s Competition Tribunal

February 15, 2019
       

Blog

Health Canada Guidance on Cannabis Recalls

February 14, 2019
       

Blog

The Business Council of Canada’s Task Force on Canada’s [...]

February 14, 2019
       

Blog

CBCA Private Corporations Subject to New Shareholder [...]

February 11, 2019
       

Blog

Curtailment Rules Come Into Force for Production of [...]

February 06, 2019
       

Firm Information

  • People
  • About
  • Recruitment
  • Anti-Spam Learning Centre
  • Kickstart
  • Client Extranet

Offices

  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
  • United States of America
  • Beijing
  • Doha

Stay Connected

Careers

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

© Bennett Jones LLP 2019 All rights reserved. Bennett Jones refers collectively to the Canadian legal practice of Bennett Jones LLP and the international legal practices and consulting activities of various entities which are associated with Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones